- Joined
- Jul 16, 2010
- Messages
- 4,710
- Reaction score
- 187
We all know about version exclusive Pokemon, don't we? In case you don't, it's basically a Pokemon who's only available in one version (or two if there are three versions) and never available in the others. For example, Oddish and Bellsprout are version exclusives in Pokemon Red and Blue respectively, and Rufflet and Vullaby are version exclusives in Pokemon Black and White respectively. One exception (of a pair) to this case is Petilil and Cottonee, because you can trade for them in-game, so they are not considered true version exclusives.
Yes, there are certain Pokemon who are not considered version exclusives because it is possible to collect them in the version they are not readily available in, like the Petilil and Cottonee example. Another type of a pseudo version exclusive is a Pokemon who is extremely rare in one version but much more common in another, meaning that it is easier to trade for one in the version where it is common than to search it in the version where it's rare. One example of a pair are Throh and Sawk. In Pokemon Black, Sawk is more available but Throh is rarely found in shaking grass, and it's the reverse in Pokemon White.
The third version can also be the one with the pseudo version exclusive. Take Seedot as an example: in Emerald, you literally have a 1% chance of meeting up with one unless it's a swarm, making it almost like a version exclusive because you rarely met one. Trading from Ruby is easier, but if the player exerts enough effort, they can eventually find a Seedot.
Because there is rarely a guide to show which Pokemon are very rare in one version and more common in another (I never found a guide myself), it can be hard to find out who's a pseudo version exclusive.
In my opinion, pseudo version exclusive Pokemon provides an interesting decision for a player to make, as they are able to decide if it's worth getting a rare Pokemon without interaction, and they even have the option to take the easier way out and just pick someone else to trade.
So, what do you think of the idea of "pseudo version exclusives"? Is it a good idea that should be encouraged? Is it as bad as a purely version exclusive Pokemon?
Thanks for reading.
Yes, there are certain Pokemon who are not considered version exclusives because it is possible to collect them in the version they are not readily available in, like the Petilil and Cottonee example. Another type of a pseudo version exclusive is a Pokemon who is extremely rare in one version but much more common in another, meaning that it is easier to trade for one in the version where it is common than to search it in the version where it's rare. One example of a pair are Throh and Sawk. In Pokemon Black, Sawk is more available but Throh is rarely found in shaking grass, and it's the reverse in Pokemon White.
The third version can also be the one with the pseudo version exclusive. Take Seedot as an example: in Emerald, you literally have a 1% chance of meeting up with one unless it's a swarm, making it almost like a version exclusive because you rarely met one. Trading from Ruby is easier, but if the player exerts enough effort, they can eventually find a Seedot.
Because there is rarely a guide to show which Pokemon are very rare in one version and more common in another (I never found a guide myself), it can be hard to find out who's a pseudo version exclusive.
In my opinion, pseudo version exclusive Pokemon provides an interesting decision for a player to make, as they are able to decide if it's worth getting a rare Pokemon without interaction, and they even have the option to take the easier way out and just pick someone else to trade.
So, what do you think of the idea of "pseudo version exclusives"? Is it a good idea that should be encouraged? Is it as bad as a purely version exclusive Pokemon?
Thanks for reading.