- Joined
- May 30, 2012
- Messages
- 21,697
- Reaction score
- 5,330
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Role confirmed.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
.............Did Zexy sub me into a spot that's getting lynched? Wtf Zexy you jerk!!!Alright then... That's not terribly helpful, since WO can't exactly justify YT's thought process.
But, any defence for why we shouldn't lynch you based on what YT did?
This was the first occurrence. It isn't that bad this time, since Pod and pika made some very good points beforehand which had good justification.I have to agree with what Pika and MegaPod have said.
Vote: jdthebud
This was the second time. The only justification beforehand was Megapod pointing out something shifty about YT from earlier on. And Max just jumps straight onto that, apparently giving no effort to look deeper into YT or look for anyone else. His only justification when questioned was:The above makes me suspicious of YT.
Vote: Yours Truly
Which makes it look like he's just voting to make a kill.I don't know who else to vote for.
Good point. Pika did die the very night after Max was questioned.If he is scum, then he got pretty lucky when Pika decided to let him off the hook, presumably to investigate him and confirm his suspicions.
Honestly, I can't think of anything I could say to justify a vote. That's why I rely on other people's points. Yes, I know it's sheeping.Ok, so while WO's getting her bearings on this whole game, imma put the YT slot vote on hold, and talk about someone else.
Max. Twice now, he's leapt onto a bandwagon very quickly, and with pretty much no justification of his own.
This was the first occurrence. It isn't that bad this time, since Pod and pika made some very good points beforehand which had good justification.
This was the second time. The only justification beforehand was Megapod pointing out something shifty about YT from earlier on. And Max just jumps straight onto that, apparently giving no effort to look deeper into YT or look for anyone else. His only justification when questioned was:
Which makes it look like he's just voting to make a kill.
What do you guys think.
Also @Max1996 defence?
Really? You really can't come up with anybody to lynch (aside from the already potentially scum YT slot) by looking back at the thread? Absolutely nothing?Honestly, I can't think of anything I could say to justify a vote. That's why I rely on other people's points. Yes, I know it's sheeping.
Nothing comes to mind, really.Really? You really can't come up with anybody to lynch (aside from the already potentially scum YT slot) by looking back at the thread? Absolutely nothing?
I'm not going to blame you. I myself genuinely screwed up.I'm sorry Max but that just doesn't sound ok. I can see at least one other potential scum, and that's not even counting practically career inactives like @Moon Entity, @Hellcrow, and @Soulmaster (seriously guys got anything to say at all? At least Caps and Piko gave reasons).
Really Max you're just looking way too scummy to me at the moment.
Vote: Max1996
Yeah hi. I like the term career inactives, though career lurker is better in my case.I'm sorry Max but that just doesn't sound ok. I can see at least one other potential scum, and that's not even counting practically career inactives like @Moon Entity, @Hellcrow, and @Soulmaster (seriously guys got anything to say at all? At least Caps and Piko gave reasons).
Really Max you're just looking way too scummy to me at the moment.
Vote: Max1996
Yes having subs is annoying, but they give two different viewpoints of one role, so what the different people agree on means it is that much more likely true.I'm at least glad to know you're giving this game some effort, Soulmaster. I can imagine it's not terribly easy to be a sub entering the game late. Besides that, having all these substitutions isn't so great since it makes it harder to get reads on so many slots...