It could also be the option that "Stars" has the same setting as SM (takes place in Alola), but with a generally different story-line/path to follow. That would shake things up quite nicely from the traditional follow-up game formula.
I agree about Z being pure speculation. However, I recall that the whole Z thing started because people noticed that Kalos didn't have a lot going for it content-wise. Personally, I'd hate to have people say the same thing about Alola with GF cutting Gen 7 off here while likely giving Necrozma...
But since GF skipped Z, it does make we worry that Gen VII will become a one pair generation. The fact that they're talking about Marshadow now really makes me worry since we'd have run out of Mythicals to get a distribution afterwards.
Why stop at one or the other? Personally, I'd like for there to be one game with two mascots for a change. I'm thinking that there's going to be a parallel between Zygarde and Necrozma, both with how their formes work and their behavior. People have already speculated that Necrozma is just one...
I think it's just so you have trade fodder so you don't have to give up your box mascot for the other one. I doubt Game Freak really came up with an in-universe reason for this.
However, I would say that having Lillie be with Nebby in the open makes it likely for someone Lillie doesn't know or...
That just gives me an idea. What if in Stars, you get one mascot while Lillie gets the other? That way, it would further cement your character's friendship due to having something in common. It would also be be awesome to have a Solgaleo vs. Lunala fight between you and Lillie!
One thing I could see Game Freak doing, besides putting Triple and Rotation Battles back in, is merge the SOS mechanic with horde battles. Image if a Pokémon called for help, and a horde would end up forming as a result. This, combined with the Adrenaline Orb, could mean infinite horde battles...
I may not be from Europe, but this is definitely blunt and cold-hearted truth. I empathize with them. An entire continent shouldn't be punished for what only one or two countries have done. Not only that, but I think Canada is just as guilty for this if I remember correctly.
I have a slightly...
I just had an epiphany. Okay, it's more like wishful thinking, but what if Stars isn't Necrozma's game? What if it's Marshadow's instead?
Sure, we think it's going to be a Mythical Pokémon, but its placement in the National Dex could just be Game Freak screwing with us this time.
Has there ever been an instance where a console/handlheld incompatible with its predecessor being able to communicate with the same game it has a port of, just on a different system? If not, then we will have to agree to disagree until we get confirmation on the Switch's wireless connection...
We know that Crystal was put on a different console, with it being a Game Boy Color exclusive instead of being a Game Boy Game with Game Boy Color features if played on that console. It is true that Crystal was in the same generation as Gold and Silver. I should also mention that Crystal could...
Perhaps. There's also the chance that we'll get something similar to the Battle Tents from Emerald in order to test out new battle formats (or at least the ones they removed from SM) that once you beat a facility, you can unlock that battle style for the Battle Tree.
Also, Game Freak should...
I'm a bit disappointed that all we're talking about is which console Stars should be on. Shouldn't we at least talk about what Stars might add or do differently plot-wise and or gameplay wise?
Let's start by talking about Move Tutor moves. I'm thinking Burn Out, Boomburst as @Lufenian has...
Like I said in the Rumors/Leaks thread, Game Freak needs to make some significant changes or features if they want to justify a third version on the Switch beyond jsut better graphics. For example, maybe we get different Trail Captains, or some existing ones are put on different Islands. Heck...
Okay, if Stars turns out to be real, what type of Move Tutors do you see happening? I'd personally want Burn Out to join the mix since this move really seems to shake things up.
I know I mentioned it before, but I'll ask again: What if Pokémon Stars ends up being partially a Yellow throwback with either Ash-Hat Pikachu or Mimikyu as your starter? It could be different enough to what we have been used to with third versions since Crystal.
For the Mimikyu bit, it also...
Okay, this thought just occurred to me. We know how SM loves to make Kanto/Gen I references, right? Well, what if Stars was partially some sort of Pokémon Yellow Version: Special Pikachu Edition reference where you either get some sort of special Pikachu or a Mimikyu as your starter Pokémon with...
If they do that, then that just proves my theory that Game Freak is secretly ashamed of Kalos due to not coming out as coherent as they would have liked due to Nintendo pushing them. I'd much rather Game Freak do something like Pokémon Z-clipse, the first single game to have two legendary...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.