- Joined
- Jul 12, 2011
- Messages
- 14,622
- Reaction score
- 4,574
The return of berry pots
AND another Ranger game
AND another Ranger game
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GTS limitations. What I mean by that is for GTS to keep impossible requests off the trade list. Too many trolls take up space by showing off their Pokémon and not allowing people to trade for them by asking for Pokémon available only by hacking. This is exactly what needs to stop.
Fusions. Massive, MASSIVE no. That would be too painstaking. That'd mean at least 274760478976 models of Gen 1 - 5 Pokemon alone. Add to that all the forms and gender differences are in X and Y. That alone would take years to do. It's practically impossible to fit that many models into one game, then adding more and more each Gen? It would become too much to handle, and everything would crash. If the game had a built in system that generates a fused sprite, however, than it might work.Fixing all the egg group systems, and... Introduce Fusion Evolutions for two related Pokémon.
Fusions. Massive, MASSIVE no. That would be too painstaking. That'd mean at least 274760478976 models of Gen 1 - 5 Pokemon alone. Add to that all the forms and gender differences are in X and Y. That alone would take years to do. It's practically impossible to fit that many models into one game, then adding more and more each Gen? It would become too much to handle, and everything would crash. If the game had a built in system that generates a fused sprite, however, than it might work.
Meanwhile, I think when you put a Pokemon up onto the GTS, you should ONLY have the option to ask for a Pokemon of equal value, and there should be a system where you can't ask for a Pokemon below its legal level. In the case of event Pokemon like lv50 Dragonite or Hydreigon etc, they should have a system where you can trade event Pokemon specifically.
All I mean by that is like, when you put up a basic un-evolved Pokemon, you can only ask for Pokemon that are also basic un-evolved. Same with stage 1, or stage 2 or whatever. If that won't work, legendaries for legendaries and shiny for shiny would be a fine restriction.Second... please, no. We don't need Gamefreak defining for us which Pokemon are equal in worth to which. Just ban the illegal level-9-and-unders.
All I mean by that is like, when you put up a basic un-evolved Pokemon, you can only ask for Pokemon that are also basic un-evolved. Same with stage 1, or stage 2 or whatever. If that won't work, legendaries for legendaries and shiny for shiny would be a fine restriction.Second... please, no. We don't need Gamefreak defining for us which Pokemon are equal in worth to which. Just ban the illegal level-9-and-unders.
The return of berry pots
AND another Ranger game
It'd just make unfair trades impossible. You'd think Game Freak could trust the players... But there should be some restriction, as in to prevent people asking for a Darkrai or Dragonite for their Magikarp.All I mean by that is like, when you put up a basic un-evolved Pokemon, you can only ask for Pokemon that are also basic un-evolved. Same with stage 1, or stage 2 or whatever. If that won't work, legendaries for legendaries and shiny for shiny would be a fine restriction.Second... please, no. We don't need Gamefreak defining for us which Pokemon are equal in worth to which. Just ban the illegal level-9-and-unders.
That's still an unnecessary limitation. And it's perfectly possible that a player might think a given evolved Pokemon has the same worth as a given unevolved one, and a legendary the same worth as a non-legendary, especially if all they're trying to do is complete their Pokedex. There's absolutely no reason to limit GTS requests like that.
Maybe they really need a magikarp for their pokedex, or really like it, and don't need or don't want darkrai or dragonite and are willing to trade, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.It'd just make unfair trades impossible. You'd think Game Freak could trust the players... But there should be some restriction, as in to prevent people asking for a Darkrai or Dragonite for their Magikarp.All I mean by that is like, when you put up a basic un-evolved Pokemon, you can only ask for Pokemon that are also basic un-evolved. Same with stage 1, or stage 2 or whatever. If that won't work, legendaries for legendaries and shiny for shiny would be a fine restriction.Second... please, no. We don't need Gamefreak defining for us which Pokemon are equal in worth to which. Just ban the illegal level-9-and-unders.
That's still an unnecessary limitation. And it's perfectly possible that a player might think a given evolved Pokemon has the same worth as a given unevolved one, and a legendary the same worth as a non-legendary, especially if all they're trying to do is complete their Pokedex. There's absolutely no reason to limit GTS requests like that.
This. Seriously just this.Just ban the illegal level-9-and-unders.
I want to see the poison status reduce either defense or special defense like how burn lowers attack or paralysis lowers speed. Frozen can lower the other defense, while sleep lowers special attack.
I was thinking in terms of what the statuses are generally best at. Burn and Paralysis is effective against attackers, so they harm stats that attackers are good against(or in Burn's case, that's why it's good against attackers). Toxic is good at wearing down defensive Pokémon, so lowering their defense would be more synergenic.I want to see the poison status reduce either defense or special defense like how burn lowers attack or paralysis lowers speed. Frozen can lower the other defense, while sleep lowers special attack.
I'd think it would make sense for poison to lower special attack, ice to lower defense and sleep to lower special defense. Or possible switch ice and sleep. Cuz what would be the point of sleep lowering special attack? Very few pokemon attack whilst asleep.
Gengar's Pokédex entry says the following:
-A Gengar is close by if you feel a sudden chill. It may be trying to lay a curse on you.
-It steals heat from its surroundings. If you feel a sudden chill, it is certain that a Gengar appeared.
-Hiding in people's shadows at night, it absorbs their heat. The chill it causes makes the victims shake.
-It hides in shadows. It is said that if Gengar is hiding, it cools the area by nearly 10 degrees F.
______________________
Therefore, I think Gengar should be able to learn Ice Beam and Blizzard.
Maybe we could have Cold Wave, an Ice version of Heat Wave. 10% Freeze? Hits all adjacent targets? 100 power? I like.
Makes sense to me. I just want to see more decent Ice-type moves.Gengar's Pokédex entry says the following:
-A Gengar is close by if you feel a sudden chill. It may be trying to lay a curse on you.
-It steals heat from its surroundings. If you feel a sudden chill, it is certain that a Gengar appeared.
-Hiding in people's shadows at night, it absorbs their heat. The chill it causes makes the victims shake.
-It hides in shadows. It is said that if Gengar is hiding, it cools the area by nearly 10 degrees F.
______________________
Therefore, I think Gengar should be able to learn Ice Beam and Blizzard.
Maybe we could have Cold Wave, an Ice version of Heat Wave. 10% Freeze? Hits all adjacent targets? 100 power? I like.
A move like this with different distribution to Ice Beam/Blizzard would be great, but I think they should call it Cold Snap, which is the general term used for the opposite of a heat wave.
I want to see the poison status reduce either defense or special defense like how burn lowers attack or paralysis lowers speed. Frozen can lower the other defense, while sleep lowers special attack.