Paperhorse
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2009
- Messages
- 2,486
- Reaction score
- 21
Re: Werewolf -- Night 0 3/31/13
Confirming.
Confirming.
-
Hey Trainers! Be sure to check out Corsola Beach, our newest section on the forums, in partnership with our friends at Corsola Cove! At the Beach, you can discuss the competitive side of the games, post your favorite Pokemon memes, and connect with other Pokemon creators!
-
Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.
Werewolf -- Endgame, Town Victory -- 5/8/13
- Thread starter Phoenicks
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- May 30, 2012
- Messages
- 21,699
- Reaction score
- 5,333
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Re: Werewolf -- Night 0 3/31/13
Confirming
Confirming
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 69,135
- Reaction score
- 302
Re: Werewolf -- Night 0 3/31/13
Role confirmed.
Role confirmed.
ShinyFlareon
bowtie coconut birb
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2007
- Messages
- 7,134
- Reaction score
- 48
Re: Werewolf -- Night 0 3/31/13
Nine confirmations have been sent in. You may begin voting - good luck everyone!
Nine confirmations have been sent in. You may begin voting - good luck everyone!
DerMißingno
Gutes deutsches Bier
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2009
- Messages
- 14,940
- Reaction score
- 4
Re: Werewolf -- Night 0 3/31/13
Role confirmed.
Let's get it started then.
Vote: Sourcandy
Role confirmed.
Let's get it started then.
Vote: Sourcandy
- Joined
- May 30, 2012
- Messages
- 21,699
- Reaction score
- 5,333
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Re: Werewolf -- Night 0 3/31/13
VOTE: TheMissingno You said you get mafia a lot
First to use meta
VOTE: TheMissingno You said you get mafia a lot
Master Mew
Level 7
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2010
- Messages
- 3,638
- Reaction score
- 8
Re: Werewolf -- Night 0 3/31/13
Role confirmed.
Zima: What does the game's size have to do with whether or not we should lynch someone on Day 1? Either a Day 1 lynch is good or it's bad, right?
Also, the suggested choice between "randomness" and no lynch is a false dichotomy, as we can lynch without being random.
Yatagarasu: That's not just meta (which is not, incidentally, inherently bad), that's applying someone else's self-meta (which is, incidentally, inherently unreliable) - it also suggests that the game's roles were not RNG'd, as if they were, the object of your meta-analysis (role distribution) would be exempt anyway.
I also feel inclined to ask you what you have against the Sourcandy wagon, since you're launching a counterwagon.
Vote: Sourcandy
1.) She's the leading wagon.
2.) I have yet to find a reason to believe she is Town.
3.) I have yet to find a reason to believe someone else would be a better lynch.
Vote is, of course, subject to change as circumstances change. Until such a time arrives, however, consider this a very serious vote. ;-)
I'm out of RVS now, don't know about the rest of you.
Role confirmed.
Zima: What does the game's size have to do with whether or not we should lynch someone on Day 1? Either a Day 1 lynch is good or it's bad, right?
Also, the suggested choice between "randomness" and no lynch is a false dichotomy, as we can lynch without being random.
Yatagarasu: That's not just meta (which is not, incidentally, inherently bad), that's applying someone else's self-meta (which is, incidentally, inherently unreliable) - it also suggests that the game's roles were not RNG'd, as if they were, the object of your meta-analysis (role distribution) would be exempt anyway.
I also feel inclined to ask you what you have against the Sourcandy wagon, since you're launching a counterwagon.
Vote: Sourcandy
1.) She's the leading wagon.
2.) I have yet to find a reason to believe she is Town.
3.) I have yet to find a reason to believe someone else would be a better lynch.
Vote is, of course, subject to change as circumstances change. Until such a time arrives, however, consider this a very serious vote. ;-)
I'm out of RVS now, don't know about the rest of you.
CrackFox
Mutha'uckas
- Joined
- May 20, 2009
- Messages
- 6,299
- Reaction score
- 27
Re: Werewolf -- Day 1 3/31/13
This game started already
Oh well, not much to catch up on. I'm gonna go with the bandwagon on this one. Mainly because a failed lynch can still provide intel. A 'no lynch' will not. We might get lucky and SC always seems scummy to me, so I would be happy to take a risk with her.
Vote: SourCandy
This game started already
Oh well, not much to catch up on. I'm gonna go with the bandwagon on this one. Mainly because a failed lynch can still provide intel. A 'no lynch' will not. We might get lucky and SC always seems scummy to me, so I would be happy to take a risk with her.
Vote: SourCandy
Master Mew
Level 7
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2010
- Messages
- 3,638
- Reaction score
- 8
Re: Werewolf -- Day 1 3/31/13
Still mulling things over, and still waiting on responses from @Zima; and @Yatagarasu;.
Still mulling things over, and still waiting on responses from @Zima; and @Yatagarasu;.
- Joined
- May 30, 2012
- Messages
- 21,699
- Reaction score
- 5,333
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Re: Werewolf -- Day 1 3/31/13
@Master Mew; Sorry I forgot to subscribe from the thread. In response I wasn't voting with the intention a counter wagon nor will I support a bandwagon on someone day one with no evidence to suggest they are mafia. For all we know SC could be a PR. Lynches in small games can cost us a lot. Right now if SC is town then mafia can hide on the bandwagon and avoid conversation.
UNVOTE: TheMissingno
VOTE: No Lynch
At this point I believe it to be the safer route.
@Master Mew; Sorry I forgot to subscribe from the thread. In response I wasn't voting with the intention a counter wagon nor will I support a bandwagon on someone day one with no evidence to suggest they are mafia. For all we know SC could be a PR. Lynches in small games can cost us a lot. Right now if SC is town then mafia can hide on the bandwagon and avoid conversation.
UNVOTE: TheMissingno
VOTE: No Lynch
At this point I believe it to be the safer route.
Master Mew
Level 7
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2010
- Messages
- 3,638
- Reaction score
- 8
- Joined
- May 30, 2012
- Messages
- 21,699
- Reaction score
- 5,333
- Pronouns
- She/Her
Re: Werewolf -- Day 1 3/31/13
Well then
UNVOTE: No Lynch
VOTE: Sourcandy
Hopefully this will give us some info then
Well then
UNVOTE: No Lynch
VOTE: Sourcandy
Hopefully this will give us some info then
Master Mew
Level 7
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2010
- Messages
- 3,638
- Reaction score
- 8
Re: Werewolf -- Day 1 3/31/13
Well that was strange.
How do you go from refusing to vote someone without evidence to voting someone without evidence purely by virtue of discovering that we have to lynch someone this phase? We have no deadline, there's no rush, you could have just unvoted "No Lynch," started scumhunting, and not voted for anyone else until you found a suspect you were comfortable with voting for, but instead you just slipped into the bandwagon that you've been opposing up until this point without any explanation of what changed your mind.
Unvote: Sourcandy
Vote: Yatagarasu
I posit that Yatagarasu has decided to "hide on the bandwagon and avoid conversation" - which is interesting, given that she had just ascribed that tactic to Scum in her previous post.
EDIT: The Reader's Digest version:
A.) Yatagarasu believes voting for someone without evidence hurts the Town.
B.) Yatagarasu voted for someone without evidence.
Therefore:
C.) Yatagarasu believes she is hurting the Town.
Well that was strange.
How do you go from refusing to vote someone without evidence to voting someone without evidence purely by virtue of discovering that we have to lynch someone this phase? We have no deadline, there's no rush, you could have just unvoted "No Lynch," started scumhunting, and not voted for anyone else until you found a suspect you were comfortable with voting for, but instead you just slipped into the bandwagon that you've been opposing up until this point without any explanation of what changed your mind.
Unvote: Sourcandy
Vote: Yatagarasu
I posit that Yatagarasu has decided to "hide on the bandwagon and avoid conversation" - which is interesting, given that she had just ascribed that tactic to Scum in her previous post.
EDIT: The Reader's Digest version:
A.) Yatagarasu believes voting for someone without evidence hurts the Town.
B.) Yatagarasu voted for someone without evidence.
Therefore:
C.) Yatagarasu believes she is hurting the Town.
Last edited:
DerMißingno
Gutes deutsches Bier
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2009
- Messages
- 14,940
- Reaction score
- 4
Re: Werewolf -- Day 1 3/31/13
Unvote: Sourcandy
I will now give everyone who has played a scum score out of 10.
Why I think people could be mafia (or not):
Oh come on now with that attitude.
Scum score: 3/10
Meta or not, what I've been before has nothing to do with what I am now. If you win the lottery 10 times in a row it still doesn't effect your chances of winning another.
Scum score: 3/10
However, Master Mew brings up some good points about your self contradiction. I'll upgrade your score to 4/10.
Too bad not paying attention to the rules isn't a scum tell. Though one may also consider a no lynch to be a waste of a phase, but I'm not having that argument.
Scum score: 3/10
@Master Mew;
1) You're third on the wagon, it wasn't really a wagon until you posted that because she voted herself (which could be playing against her win condition but I'm not the host so)
2) Do you have a reason to believe she's not town?
3) cool
Scum score: 4/10
I question how much intel a lynch provides when 6 people vote with no real discussion. What exactly seems scummy to you about Sourcandy in this game?
Scum score: 4.5/10
I'm going to vote: CrackFox until I get a response.
Unvote: Sourcandy
I will now give everyone who has played a scum score out of 10.
Why I think people could be mafia (or not):
Oh come on now with that attitude.
Scum score: 3/10
Meta or not, what I've been before has nothing to do with what I am now. If you win the lottery 10 times in a row it still doesn't effect your chances of winning another.
Scum score: 3/10
However, Master Mew brings up some good points about your self contradiction. I'll upgrade your score to 4/10.
Too bad not paying attention to the rules isn't a scum tell. Though one may also consider a no lynch to be a waste of a phase, but I'm not having that argument.
Scum score: 3/10
@Master Mew;
1) You're third on the wagon, it wasn't really a wagon until you posted that because she voted herself (which could be playing against her win condition but I'm not the host so)
2) Do you have a reason to believe she's not town?
3) cool
Scum score: 4/10
This game started already
Oh well, not much to catch up on. I'm gonna go with the bandwagon on this one. Mainly because a failed lynch can still provide intel. A 'no lynch' will not. We might get lucky and SC always seems scummy to me, so I would be happy to take a risk with her.
Vote: SourCandy
I question how much intel a lynch provides when 6 people vote with no real discussion. What exactly seems scummy to you about Sourcandy in this game?
Scum score: 4.5/10
I'm going to vote: CrackFox until I get a response.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
