- Joined
- Aug 9, 2016
- Messages
- 8,113
- Reaction score
- 24,606
More like that graphics aren't really the issue so switching to 2D isn't a solution to what is actually wrong.So, you think Pokémon is a lost cause?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More like that graphics aren't really the issue so switching to 2D isn't a solution to what is actually wrong.So, you think Pokémon is a lost cause?
Thank you.More like that graphics aren't really the issue so switching to 2D isn't a solution to what is actually wrong.
So in other words, Game Freak would have done the same exact stupid move of removing Pokémon had the games still been 2D?More like that graphics aren't really the issue so switching to 2D isn't a solution to what is actually wrong.
I think so, and the same goes to the mistakes they made in Gen VI and Gen VII.So in other words, Game Freak would have done the same exact stupid move of removing Pokémon had the games still been 2D?
They would've had to have drawn and animated 800+ pokemon from scratch in 2D, so yeah. Not exactly a time saver.So in other words, Game Freak would have done the same exact stupid move of removing Pokémon had the games still been 2D?
I mean, I could understand the whole Battle Frontier exclusion still happening, but what excuse would they have had for removing Pokémon from Gen 8?I think so, and the same goes to the mistakes they made in Gen VI and Gen VII.
As someone who wants to go to the animation industry. The studios have their own schedule too, sure they come out at the same time as the games but at the same time they keep as long as the actual games longevity, hence why each season lasts about 3 years or so. Telling em they now have to add extra 1 or 2 years is already more money they have to poor into the animation budget, not to mention extra planning and padding which could potentially ruin the shows quality costing them ratings. It's not simply a situation of just "Draw longer" a lot of scheduling and financial planning goes into this. Not to mention some artists might have other projects to work on so you have to pay more for their time to stay on board. Long story short, it's not simple. If it was they'd have done it.
Not exactly sure, but I feel it could be something similar to what they said now. Like Oriden said, they would still have to draw 800+ Pokémon + alt formes, megas, etc.I mean, I could understand the whole Battle Frontier exclusion still happening, but what excuse would they have had for removing Pokémon from Gen 8?
They don't, though. The anime and TCG were still receiving updates in 2015, despite there being no main series release at the time.They gotta move in tandem with the anime and TCG.
We've had the same protagonist for two decades, with little character development, and that hasn't ruined the show's quality-why would filler episodes do that? (Besides, isn't filler what the anime does best? I'm pretty sure that gym leader battles don't happen every episode)As someone who wants to go to the animation industry. The studios have their own schedule too, sure they come out at the same time as the games but at the same time they keep as long as the actual games longevity, hence why each season lasts about 3 years or so. Telling em they now have to add extra 1 or 2 years is already more money they have to poor into the animation budget, not to mention extra planning and padding which could potentially ruin the shows quality costing them ratings. It's not simply a situation of just "Draw longer" a lot of scheduling and financial planning goes into this. Not to mention some artists might have other projects to work on so you have to pay more for their time to stay on board. Long story short, it's not simple. If it was they'd have done it.
if you are referring to the dex, yeah i think they would have because as they stated (whether people agree with it or not) it was more than just the time with graphics. such as game balancing. and eventually we would get so many mons anyway that 2D vs 3D when it comes to time isn't going to matter. Alot of mons is just that, alot of mons.So in other words, Game Freak would have done the same exact stupid move of removing Pokémon had the games still been 2D?
so going against the grain of a few others here, i don't think they'd've made that decision, however i also don't think that the games would have significantly changed. you know, other dimension where XY and SM are in 2D instead of 3D and considering Game Freak's past games.....yeah they're pretty much the same just....2D.So in other words, Game Freak would have done the same exact stupid move of removing Pokémon had the games still been 2D?
I'm getting motion sickness just thinking about Lumiose.Also, now that I think about it, the only thing not going to 3D would have prevented would have been Lumiose City.
I agree with this, but I don't think that is why some people are bringing up the 2D. I do see their thought process of well it may save time they could use on other things, but that can only work for so long anyway. But I know I am fine with 2D graphics with older things we don't have now with 3D. 2D being associated with that because of "less time less complexity" is hypothetical though.More like that graphics aren't really the issue so switching to 2D isn't a solution to what is actually wrong.
I don't think the "Meteor" in its name implies that it's from space. Meteorology is the study of the atmosphere and weather, and we know that the dynamax phenomenon has a cloud element to it, so it's probably referring to that.
Not sure where this idea that they can't handle it comes from... making a ton of new 2D sprites isn't really quicker than re-texturing models, so it wouldn't help there. The only difference I can see is that the games would flat out stagnate graphically. Welcome to your totally different pokemon adventure where the only difference is that we rearranged the map.I agree with this, but I don't think that is why some people are bringing up the 2D. I do see their thought process of well it may save time they could use on other things, but that can only work for so long anyway. But I know I am fine with 2D graphics with older things we don't have now with 3D. 2D being associated with that because of "less time less complexity" is hypothetical though.
I know for myself with 2D, it's a matter if gamefreak can handle doing things in 3D or not. There are so many complaints about how they made some 3D things in the overworld.
And they are already have massive criticism about the dex issue and then lost features and nice things like actually having to do something or some story with catching ledgendaries or mythicals, ect.
And that would be the only reason, I think, of the consideration of going back to 2D. Is if 3D is too hard for them to handle and is making the product suffer and consumers not being happy.