Tourmaline
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2013
- Messages
- 13
- Reaction score
- 20
They could pull a DQXI and give you a choice between pixels and 3D.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I feel they'll sneak a reference to Rotom and/or Kalos there.I just remembered in some post-game the Grass Gym Leader Gardenia or someone says something in that spooky Eterna Forest, about liking grass types, but afraid of ghost types, and said something about what if there was a Grass and Ghost type?
I wonder if they'll redub her line.
Or maybe she'll say the exact same thing.
I just remembered in some post-game the Grass Gym Leader Gardenia or someone says something in that spooky Eterna Forest, about liking grass types, but afraid of ghost types, and said something about what if there was a Grass and Ghost type?
I wonder if they'll redub her line.
Or maybe she'll say the exact same thing.
"Hey. Do you know the Pokémon Pumpkaboo and Phantump?""As you know, I really love Grass-type Pokémon, but...""These two, they're not just Grass type. They're also Ghost type!""I want to take care of them and cuddle them too, so I can get over my fear."
"See, I think they're cute. I really do.""But their movements and whatnot are a bit different from normal Grass types, and they scare me a little.""Still, as a Grass-type Pokémon Trainer, I can't just stay scared! Someday I'll be able to cuddle them!"
- If spoken to again
Indie games also don't come with the Pokemon pricetag. This game shouldn't be anymore than $30, and those who say "Well, platinum wasn't $30 on release either" ignore the fact that we don't hold the same standards today. RBY were released on 3DS, and they sure as hell were not priced to 1998 standards. Playing a top down, sprite inspired, game on the Nintendo Switch for a full price-tag is a greedy thing to ask, yet they somehow went through with it.
I think so, considering that:I wonder if there will be some dialogues adjusted that hint at later generations?
Remember in Hoenn there was a scientist in Devon Corp. who was researching Pokemon dreams? In ORAS the scientist's lines were changed to acknowledge Fennel's Dream World research in Unova.
Pokemon Sun and Moon.I'd like to see a 3ds game which actually looks as good.
Legit question; who is going around calling people "sheep" for liking the game? I’m pretty sure it goes against the forum rules. There literally shouldn’t be any of that going on on "both sides" so I’m confused as to the various comments saying they’re being insulted for liking the game.*sigh* This will be a long year... Also, love how not being displeased with the graphics is treated as being a sheep. Sorry for not hating the same things as you! Sorry for not doing the same thing I did back in 2014!
...Sorry for the rant, but I needed to get that out of my chest.
But long analysis can be requested, specially since it’s been said that a lot of people are being negative just for the sake of being negative unless they choose to write long analysis. It should work both ways, shouldn’t it?Respectfully, no one owes you an explanation of anything. People are free to express their like or dislike of something simply. Not everyone is comfortable with long analyses, and that’s ok.
I'd interpret it as being an analogy.Legit question; who is going around calling people "sheep" for liking the game? I’m pretty sure it goes against the forum rules.
Legit question; who is going around calling people "sheep" for liking the game? I’m pretty sure it goes against the forum rules. There literally shouldn’t be any of that going on on "both sides" so I’m confused as to the various comments saying they’re being insulted for liking the game.
Analysis can be asked for respectfully; not demanded. And, still, no one should be obligated to give one at risk of being labeled in any way. It isn’t right when either side does it, though I honestly haven’t seen too much if any of the accusation of “you’re being negative just for the sake of being negative”.But long analysis can be requested, specially since it’s been said that a lot of people are being negative just for the sake of being negative unless they choose to write long analysis. It should work both ways, shouldn’t it?
As much as I want to believe you to be correct, there is a reason behind such a decision: porting the Gen 4 games would be a nightmare due to the dual screen aspect needing to be reworked.Oh. I see. I am sure there will be new stuff. Why would they not. I think when they say faithful recreation, the producers mean the map itself for the most part. Again, I think there will be new stuff. Why would they make these if all they did was give it a new coat of paint?
One last thing: We only have ONE trailer right now. Yes, what we saw makes it seem like nothing new is there, I get it.
Analysis can be asked for respectfully; not demanded. And, still, no one should be obligated to give one at risk of being labeled in any way. It isn’t right when either side does it, though I honestly haven’t seen too much if any of the accusation of “you’re being negative just for the sake of being negative”.
What aspect of my posts suggested I ""demanded"" an explanation? I only suggested one as an optional request. Like any post in the forums, it's really up to the posters to respond - I'm not forcing anyone. (And it's not even possible for me to do that anyways. :/ )
It came off as demanding to me. You didn’t ask “Could you elaborate?” you said “At least give a true analysis” implying his opinion was any less valid just because he didn’t expound upon it initially. Maybe your intent wasn’t to be demanding, but that’s how it came off to me based on the language you used.Lanstar said:At least give a true analysis of why you like the graphics, rather than just saying, "I like it."
I've lost almost all drive to post on most platforms due to the "us vs them" going on everywhere. I don’t really feel like writing analysis on these forums as well since a lot of it is just dismissed by anyone having an opposing opinion.Whatever you do....DO NOT go to Twitter, Youtube, Reddit, or anywhere on the internet right now.
I'm sure I'm in the minority here but I legitimately don't think Gen VII was a good looking gen. Only good thing about them were the human models. But environments were eh. I preferred Gen VI in that regard.Pokemon Sun and Moon.
That’s what, art styles are subjective. For me Sun and Moon with Switch resolutions look better than what BDSP are. Imo the design language of BDSP is really scattered, whereas a lot of these entries have cohesion built into the design language. I’ll take ORAS and LGPE styles over BDSP any day, too.I'm sure I'm in the minority here but I legitimately don't think Gen VII was a good looking gen. Only good thing about them were the human models. But environments were eh. I preferred Gen VI in that regard.
Fairly good post and I agree with all your points. I get why people are dissatisfied with the remakes. And that's fine. I have enough empathy for those who loved Gen IV and wanted a remake similar to SwSh. My empathy dies the moment someone takes an objective stance on the appearance, however. The games don't objectively look worse to me.I've lost almost all drive to post on most platforms due to the "us vs them" going on everywhere. I don’t really feel like writing analysis on these forums as well since a lot of it is just dismissed by anyone having an opposing opinion.
The fact that I feel that this game has less effort put into it than other entries shouldn’t deter anyone else from enjoying it. They’re free to enjoy what they please. Worth is subjective but I strongly feel that this game isn’t worth full price to me and many others. I’d welcome the chibi style if it were actually consistent. One of the plus points of Let's Go were its charming art style and the great use of lighting and perspective. However these games feel like a downgrade in that aspect. The lighting is all over the place and in the initial trailer some elements felt borderline photoshopped in to me due to the wild inconsistency.
This, combined with the timing of the games, the art direction they went with and the fact that they outsourced it leads me to believe that these games were rushed out.
I've seen a lot of posts commenting on "You wanted Sinnoh remakes, where’s your enuthsiasm now?". I’ve been previously quiet on this, but this feels borderline taunting. It’s hard to deny that this feels underwhelming in the era of LGPE, SwSh and LA. This is not what most people were expecting when it comes to a Sinnoh remake and since a lot of people already saw it as a downgrade (and I reiterate, some do NOT see it as a downgrade but it’s hard to deny that some do), so I feel it’s hardly appropriate to force them to be excited about the entries.
They probably imagined their favourite games evolve on the system, as ORAS was by the 3DS graphics, and as LGPE was compared to FRLG. A lot of us wanted to explore distortion world with a better 3D perspective. And then we got this. Again, people are free to enjoy the faithful remake, but I do request them to have a perspective on why others are not as enthused. Specially since with the history of the franchise, the remakes will be faithful to a fault but then remove the actual good stuff that needs to be faithful like the extra exploration, the battle frontier and the rest of it due to precedent.
A little bit of perspective from both sides would help a lot on these forums. I’m just a regular user but I urge everyone to have empathy for the "other side". There shouldn’t even be a "other side" to speak of since ultimately we're drawn together by the love of the same franchise. We all want the games to get better, this is why "They just want to nitpick at any entries", "They just buy everything" and all the rest are not good mentalities to hold.
Please understand why some people are enthusiastic about the games and why others are flat out disappointed in the direction these games went. As one of the most awaited remakes, this situation was bound to happen, but this intensified it further. It’s useless trying to victimise any side or paint anyone as the aggressor.