• Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.
  • Pronoun field selections have been updated! To ensure they show up correctly, please reselect your preferred option(s) in the Account details page. Click here for more information.
G
Local time
3:41 PM
Reaction score
0

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • That's perfectly fine, if another player selects Sakak as a co-character, all it really means is that Sakak will be present in the series of events, and generally working against said-player's foe. Sakak can easily do so alone, and in any way he desires.
    Don't worry about it, the line isn't that important. At any given time you could potentially be thrown in on the Hero or Villain side of a roleplay anyway, so it works.
    Ok. Well, I won't change anything you wrote in his bio, I'll just list him under villains. Sound fair?
    I'll check it out.

    As to Sakak, I'm not necessarily saying he strikes me as "evil" - it's just that generally, when someone is out to serve their own interests, only doing good occasionally if it benefits them, they're classified as a villain - or perhaps an antihero.

    Of course, what it really comes down to is I'm not sure how to classify him in the character-listing ;-)
    Alright, so Trial H delivers the Dagger, then the Lara doppleganger attempts to steal the Dagger back from the Fiamma Nera - that would incite their wrath ;-)
    The only problem I see with that is this: If Fiama Nera cult assassins show up in front of Lara's mansion and say "Give us the dagger or die" etc. etc., it becomes immediately clear that they were not the ones who stole the dagger.

    Perhaps instead the doppleganger "delivers" the dagger to the Fiama Nera? The resulting chaos would serve as a brilliant distraction.
    Well, it would be somewhat tricky to definitively implicate the Fiama Nera, as they were always very cryptic as to their intentions. The only definitive method would be, I suppose, to actually use the dagger - as only the sort of lunatics the Fiama Nera attracts would attempt such a feat, Natla obviously having no need of it.

    Truth be told, I'm glad you came to the same conclusions I did, as implicating the Fiama Nera as a scapegoat was my original intention. :)
    Ah, I see.

    Now, I have a question: Does Tennoji consider himself "evil?" I ask because Natla does not view herself in such light, she considers her goals and purposes to represent a form of nobility none but she truly understands.
    That makes sense, bear in mind however that, in actuality, Natla is indeed already an Atlantean, formerly a member of the Triumvirate that ruled the ancient civilization. She was sealed away in a form of cryogenic chamber by Tihocan and Qualopec (the other two leaders) as a form of eternal punishment for her "crimes" - namely, her creation of an army of genetically mutated Atlantean hybrids, which she used to dethrone Tihocan and Qualopec, and had intended on unleashing on all of mankind. Quote: "Evolution's in a rut, natural selection's at an all-time low. Shipping out fresh meat will incite territorial rages again. Will strengthen, and advance us. Even create new breeds."

    Pics:
    Natla in her human form
    Natla in her original form
    This is all very confusing ;-) But I suppose that's good, Lara will be confused, which will be easy for me to depict.
    So I was thinking, perhaps it would be beneficial to our villains to keep Lara in the dark as to the identity of the intruders? I mean, obviously she's seen Trial H, but she doesn't know what it is - if she doesn't see Natla as she exits with the Scion, it could potentially make for an interesting scene down the road... your thoughts?
    On the flip side, there may soon be two Laras. Natla has exhibited before that with the Scion in her possession she can create an Atlantean doppleganger of Lara. Capabilities such as those are not likely to be shared with her newfound "associates."
    Sounds good to me.

    And roleplaying Natla's confusion will be easy for me, as I'm somewhat confused by all these Jokers myself. ;-)
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top Bottom