PART 2
I've never been much a fan of how the "psychological thriller" label has been used. To me, "thriller" implies that a story is meant to be visceral, emotional, and exciting, without anything really deep to say (remember how I was with The Hurt Locker? ), but hey, maybe there are thrillers have really deep meanings to them. If there is, I haven't seen one that I'd classify as a "thriller". My favorite movie of all is one that gets the "psychological thriller" tag a lot, that being Donnie Darko, but that movie is so deep you need SCUBA gear, which is why I call it a "psychological drama" of sorts. It doesn't play off of fear enough to he "horror", the way I see it. However, Requiem for a Dream is all about fear, and it has a meaning, too; drugs are really, really bad. Using the audience's fear to get a message across is the most basic definition of horror I could give you, and so I call Requiem a horror movie.
Now that's something I don't do to myself; add more stuff than I take out. How do you do it?
I've never been much a fan of how the "psychological thriller" label has been used. To me, "thriller" implies that a story is meant to be visceral, emotional, and exciting, without anything really deep to say (remember how I was with The Hurt Locker? ), but hey, maybe there are thrillers have really deep meanings to them. If there is, I haven't seen one that I'd classify as a "thriller". My favorite movie of all is one that gets the "psychological thriller" tag a lot, that being Donnie Darko, but that movie is so deep you need SCUBA gear, which is why I call it a "psychological drama" of sorts. It doesn't play off of fear enough to he "horror", the way I see it. However, Requiem for a Dream is all about fear, and it has a meaning, too; drugs are really, really bad. Using the audience's fear to get a message across is the most basic definition of horror I could give you, and so I call Requiem a horror movie.
Now that's something I don't do to myself; add more stuff than I take out. How do you do it?