I really don't know how they analyze data for that.
Looks for me this season that community asks for something and they give the opposite. It could be just bias and not the real thing tough.
But doing at least one trailer "giving what we want" would be so bad?
As I said - they could look to the SM feedbacak until the first trailer of Sword/Shield. After that, look at the new feedback. Is it really that hard?
If they keep the way they're doing now...
Sword/Shield - Please no more kanto pandering
Gen 9 - A game in "black/white" style.
They could react to SM until the first trailer. After that they should react to the first trailer and so on... What the hell are they doing here?
Community - "The last trailer we had few information, hope for more in the next"
Reaction - 24h stream for 1 new pokemon (kanto)
Community - "I want...
Look at some parts of the video - the "big ben" city for example, or some of the wild area. It's very different than XY or SM. I respect your opinion but there's clearly an update comparing it to the older titles. If you're comparing with the game market as a whole then the answer could be...