Search results for query: *

Scarfmence is just so awesome, + I love Salamences design. My vote goes to Salamence :D

eeeer, does not compute! Where is Metagross, Lati@s, and Jirachi! Anyways, out of the list I choose Gardevior cause it was harder to find in the Hoenn region, sorta :P Also, why is kadabra on this list? D:

Thundurus-T has served me better, though each of them is pretty useful in thier own right, I chose Thundurus-T.

Torkoal's been around longer, I started in gen. 3 and torkoal recently got shell smash ;D

I think you're ignoring a very crucial fact here, and that is that bot Blaziken and Infernape will have TEAMMATES. Trust me, Blaziken can most certaintly win every infernape set out there, even those specifially tailored to taking down Blaziken, (which are not reccomended in the first place) can...

Hahahaha, so true! Pretty funny when you battle someone like that in a random battle.

Hahahaha, yeah! Sorry about the misunderstanding.

Well, Volcarona's obviously better but I just have to vote for Flygon. I always felt Flygon deserved better, maybe a new ability like Tinted Lens or Compoundeyes? Anyways, Volcarona is definetly more useful, though that stealth rock weakness somewhat holds it back... But Flygon is at least doing...

Uhhh... poll? Anyways, I prefer Salamence of the three mentioned pokemon due to it's great design and stats to match.

My apologies, I meant it in a different point of view that I can't seem to explain right now... What I meant was, Charizard has an insane, and I mean insane amount of popularity that Infernape doesn't have. So yes, Infernape can beat the living daylights out of Charizard, but he'll still be in...

Well techically Blaziken can also go mixed, but that's really not recommended, not in ubers anyways. Anyways, I never really liked what Gen IV and Gen V did to thier fire-starters. We really didn't need a repeat of the fire/fighting type 3 generations in a row... Anyways, Blaziken's the original...

1 vs. 1 Blaziken can almost always come out on top vs a Charizard, most people use special Charzizards anyways so... Aside from that, Blaziken also happens to actually be useful in other tiers with speed boost, Hi-Jump-Kick, Flare Blitz and Protect. I must say Charizards NU for a reason...

Well, the comparison is due to how these two came out during the same generation, with the same typing... Besides, you can judge them based other aspects as well, such as overall usefullness or things like that.

And to think, there used to be so few steel-type pokemon... Anyways whenever I think about steel types, Aron and his evolution family just come to mind. Personally, they just seem to be my personal definition of steel-type, however my vote goes to Metagross because of it's relation to Steven...

Well, I thought the word ugly meant, well ugly... but now that you mention it, your post makes sense.

Well, I wouldn't call Gyrados ugly. Anger prone yes, but it's design looks okay. Though my vote still goes to Milotic, one of the most majestic and captivating designs pokemon has to offer. It's pretty useful in battle too to top it off.

I'll be the wierd one who votes for the defensive bug, just prefer forretress a little more to scizor. Now honestly, I know that forretress couldn't ever hope to touch scizor in battle, but hey, at least he can set up some spikes on him or something. Course I'm not saying scizors bad, great...

Well, at least Muk isn't too hard to look at. In fact there's really nothing wrong with Muk's design, looks okay if you ask me. I just really hate the design Garbador was given, not like they had much to work with but still...

Too hard to choose!!! I've used both to some pretty good success and would rather not choose between the two...

Good to know people like ^ can make thier opinions without ignoring all logic, kinda like what Ranger Jack Walker mentioned.