Thanks for making an account and joining to fix an inconsistency you noticed!
Bulbapedia's convention is to count alternate art reprints as an extension of the original print. Phantom Forces Goomy is an exact copy of Flashfire Goomy, with the exception of new artwork. As [ages can only have one...
Sorry about that. Some users who usually don't do anything in the TCG have begun adding information for it in vast amounts, and I haven't been able to double check everything they've been doing. Glad to see another detail, collecting-oriented person taking the time to check those too!
Re: Official Bulbapedia suggestion/idea thread
To start, I'm going to mention that if you sign up for a Bulbapedia account and log in whenever you browse, all of the ads go away! It's very convenient.
Secondly, the previous/next template is a good idea in concept, but once we take into...
Would it be worth adding a Prev/Next template to the 6 Generation pages? It would help not having to scroll all the way to the bottom to go from Gen IV to Gen V
I was not even aware that template was capable to handle Energies. (I wonder when that happened). I wanted to develop a new template for the character pages to have the TCG stuff listed, because I personally find the Cards by Pokémon template rather inappropriate.
I am personally of the opinion that the more links we have, the better. Who's to say what the reader will want to go to next? As it is a new section, I don't see providing the links as a hindrance to anyone, only a convenience to some. If someone doesn't want to click, they don't have to, but if...
Name pronunciations have never been consistent within the franchise. Colosseum does it one way, the anime does it another (sometimes more than one way in the anime), and various other times where the names were officially said. If there isn't a solid "correct" method, then we can't show it on...
At the time I said it, it was later at night when the wiki works fine compared to when it has errors. I wasn't having any errors at all, and was able to do the search myself.
Saying the server has been absolutely horrible for the past month is not necessarily true. Now, this is neither here...
When Poppy asked the question, the wiki was fine. As we were having a real time conversation, the wiki would have been perfectly capable for a history search. Get your facts straight.
I don't remember saying that the "adder" needs to search for the "remover" in the history, and post on the "remover's" talk page. I meant the article talk page. As such, my point stands about it being unrealistic. It is for both.
As for the relationship between Mandibuzz and Braviary, trivia...
It is unrealistic to expect users to search in the history to find who added it, go to their talkpage, and post a message saying, "Excuse me, this shouldn't have been added for (a) and (b)." That is extremely time consuming, and in my opinion, unnecessary due to how much is contributed every...
When someone removes a piece of trivia, they are supposed to explain why it was removed in the edit summary. May it be something that was removed because it is no longer true, too restrictive, too obvious... what have you. I know I personally have been removing trivia from card pages due to...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.