From what I understand about Eternabeam's description, the move predates Max Moves aka "later forms" of the move while Eternabeam is the "original form". In any case, it's very possible this time around that Eternatus itself doesn't have a hidden original form despite it being able to change...
I mean, it might be better for new Mythicals to end being developed since having only one or two Pokemon added to the game over time would anger fans a lot more. Trust me, you do not want to make a case worse for yourself when you have many people angry at you. So it might be more beneficial to...
Well, yet another Pokemon where it's going to be a pain in the neck to obtain. As if we didn't have female Salandit and Combee for that or the Porygon line.
There's nothing wrong with wanting legendaries for trade at all, I did it all the time in OR to be able to have all three members of trios in one game.
I kind of wish the GTS wasn't removed. Yes it had major flaws, but the idea "remove it instead of fixing it" really brings down the potential for this game.
An interesting thing about Eternatus, it's the first legendary related to the box art legendaries that where it seems its original form is the normal one, aka the draconic serpent skeleton. That is if Pokedex entries agree to the story like last time.
Here's a Pokedex entry about Black Kyurem I really liked:
"It’s said that this Pokémon battles in order to protect the ideal world that will exist in the future for people and Pokémon."
What if Game Freak is planning to patch the game with Pokemon that are not yet included? I always found strange that they updated Pokedex entries of Pokemon that are most likely not available.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.