Search results for query: *

That's the one of main things that bother me about the theory. The second thing is that it doesn't make sense to refer to the original Eeveelutions as "unnamed creatures." It would be much more interesting if they turned out to be extinct species, which Generations implied.

Prototype Pokemon are either extinct species or older forms of existing Pokemon. @Boruto Duh. It's odd that he was replaced in Emerald and ORAS. @Glitchipedia My headcanon is that whoever wrote that DPPt line didn't know what they were doing. Oak and Agatha are around 70 as of Generation I.

I see them as projections of sorts. I can't explain what I mean, though.

Not to be nitpicky, but why wouldn't Spiky-eared Pichu look like proto Pichu in that case? I don't, for the same reason I disliked the Eeveelution theory. The beasts are said to embody the powers associated with their resurrection - why would they just happen to have had the same types all...