Search results for query: *

I'll be honest. I don't feel that you're right. But that may be my problem. I can't say your theory is so unreasonable.

You're still using bad analogies. You're still talking about a single/independent phrase by a single character. If we were only talking about Jessie's line or only about James's line, you may have a point. We're not, though.

You're completely ignoring the later part where James says they're 5 years too late. James changed the 10 to 5. If that was *just* an inversion of that same common expression, he would have still said 10. He didn't. The reasonable conclusion is that it was written so that James was specifically...