• Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.
  • Pronoun field selections have been updated! To ensure they show up correctly, please deselect then reselect your preferred option(s) in the Account details page. Click here for more information.

Contest Beautifly vs. Dustox

Ghost

<FONT FACE=”vivaldi”>Boo.</FONT FACE>
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
17,627
Reaction score
6
Beautifly is better than Dustox, mostly design-wise.
 

Data_Error

Gym Apprentice
Joined
Apr 15, 2010
Messages
1,428
Reaction score
0
I don't know... they both have their uses, and I love the designs of both for different reasons. Never used either on a team... I'd call them really even, actually. I'll throw my vote at Dustox since he's under-represented.
 

winstein

Mari-yo Puyo
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
4,729
Reaction score
186
Dustox for me. I guess because I got a Dustox in my team on Sapphire.
 

lmao

awesome possum
Joined
Jun 10, 2010
Messages
342
Reaction score
1
Dustox is something I'd never have on my team. Well, so is beautifly but I did when I was like 11.

So yeah, beautifly.
 

Gaga

▲ extremely gay
Joined
Jun 27, 2012
Messages
3,051
Reaction score
921
Beautifly, because I find it pretty.

I have, on several occasions, not used a powerful Pokemon because of it's appearance (Infernape comes to mind immediately)
 

Sir Turtlelot

Fossil Expert
Joined
Nov 30, 2011
Messages
194
Reaction score
10
Dustox. I've never been that big of a fan of Beautifly's design and I also like moths. That and every time I catch a Wurmple, it always evolves into a Dustox.
 
Please note: The thread is from 1 year ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Top Bottom