- Joined
- Jun 5, 2016
- Messages
- 11,647
- Reaction score
- 26,882
Yes. I’m sure that I want enough content in a $60 game to justify the higher price tag.are you sure?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. I’m sure that I want enough content in a $60 game to justify the higher price tag.are you sure?
Yes. I’m sure that I want enough content in a $60 game to justify the higher price tag.
are you sure? I saw two more... also you only see a little, Island of armor could have more then we think.
like little islands, underground and hidden things.
the Crown tundra looks like a open map with a lot of underground in it...
they can make cave systems and other stuff.
IDEK if that would justify the $30 for the DLCs. That's like half the price of the games and also without the hardware + engine development cost involved.
the price is depending on other factors... like what are the games made of... metals and steel are more expensive this days then in the past... but now fuel went down... the price actually could change. They also hired a lot of workers and corona isn't out of play taking how many people loose jobs.
taking it they theoretically would sell more games with lower price, then could ship more and less expensive
1. Not all sales are physical.you need to pay people, the CEO needs to get his millions... also there are the carriers and henchmen, people for advertisment... remember a game is a game, luxury... but if they would want to make bigger sales and outclass the competition
The casing is made from plastic, and I doubt there's all that much metal in the ROM itself. Plus, there's still physical Switch games that sell for under 60$, so clearly they don't need to charge 60$ to make up for the material cost.the price is depending on other factors... like what are the games made of... metals and steel are more expensive this days then in the past...
Yes, it is out of play, because development for these games happened long before Corona.They also hired a lot of workers and corona isn't out of play taking how many people loose jobs.
CEOs don't "need" millions, and they sure as heck don't deserve them when their businesses employ child labor.the CEO needs to get his millions...
1. Not all sales are physical.
2. Non-GameFreak studios and previous GameFreak entries have been less than $60?
3. The GameFreak studios are still small, the reason for less content and overworked people.
4. The profit margins are enough to include more content in the game without starving anyone. Literally the highest grossing multimedia franchise in the world is in no danger if it includes full towns instead of glorified hallways in the games.
The casing is made from plastic, and I doubt there's all that much metal in the ROM itself. Plus, there's still physical Switch games that sell for under 60$, so clearly they don't need to charge 60$ to make up for the material cost.
CEOs don't "need" millions, and they sure as heck don't deserve them when their businesses employ child labor.
Phones are irrelavant for digital sale. A digital sale consists only of the software and nothing else.you know how much tech and elements has your phone? if digital sale and digital copy then it would be ...
I've seen the dimensions of a Switch cartridge, so yes, I'm sure, you can't fit that much material in it, and I can link you to a physical copy of Minecraft that only costs 30$ when sold new, so yes, I'm sure that you don't need to charge 60$ for the materials.are you sure?
It would be.... the same price. Look at it on the estore. It's still 60$.if digital sale and digital copy then it would be ...
Oh, well if the company members are paid well, then I guess I'm totally fine with a CEO "needing" millions while he employs child labor.really? when was the last time you checked how many does each company member and worker earn?
Agreed completely, it is such a shame you can't ride your own Pokemon that look like they can carry you on water/in the air instead of relying on Flying Taxi and Rotom Bike.Why not instead be able to actually surf on Pokemon? Sorry but the surf bike is really dumb imho, it makes almost no sense how it's supposed to operate and it's a big step back from surfing on pokemon, so rather than see it earlier I'd rather see something better, just mho.
The flying taxi at least makes sense, but what made Game Freak come up with the “Rotom Bike should be how you surf on water in the Galar region!” idea? Was this ever touched upon in an interview of some sort?Agreed completely, it is such a shame you can't ride your own Pokemon that look like they can carry you on water/in the air instead of relying on Flying Taxi and Rotom Bike.
I don't know if it was discussed in an interview, but my best guess is that the merge of the biking and surfing mechanics was for simplicity. With the surfing Rotom Bike, GameFreak doesn't have to create another model for whatever the player would surf on and there is a smooth transition from riding to surfing, i.e. the player can go straight into the water without any sort of model switch etc.The flying taxi at least makes sense, but what made Game Freak come up with the “Rotom Bike should be how you surf on water in the Galar region!” idea? Was this ever touched upon in an interview of some sort?
So in other words, they were just being lazy.I don't know if it was discussed in an interview, but my best guess is that the merge of the biking and surfing mechanics was for simplicity. With the surfing Rotom Bike, GameFreak doesn't have to create another model for whatever the player would surf on and there is a smooth transition from riding to surfing, i.e. the player can go straight into the water without any sort of model switch etc.
So in other words, they were just being lazy.
There should be a cave there somewhere.I started playing the game recently and I just find the wild area incredibly boring. Like there's a whole lot of nothing there and it's not even visually exciting. Raids are also very very slow.