• Hey Trainers! Be sure to check out Corsola Beach, our newest section on the forums, in partnership with our friends at Corsola Cove! At the Beach, you can discuss the competitive side of the games, post your favorite Pokemon memes, and connect with other Pokemon creators!
  • Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.

Controversial opinions

Agreed, to me why it is loved so much is because people love to enjoy battles where Ash won and hate battles where he lost which is what I have seen.

Eh, I'm the opposite in that I find battles where Ash loses to be better than battles where he wins; I mean Ash versus Tobias and Ash versus Paul at Lake Acuity are among my favorite battles. I personally liked Ash versus Gary at the Johto league though because it gave their rivalry closure, regardless of who won. And I didn't think that Ash winning was lopsided or too unrealistic or anything tbh.
 
Greninja's Bond Phenomenon is overrated and overestimated wrt its strength. It only makes him a glass cannon.

Blaze-Infernape is far stronger (if not the strongest Pokemon of Ash).
The think the chart of all Ash's Pokémon's win rates can support this idea; most of the Pokémon with a higher win rate than Infernape (Krookodile, Snorlax, Glalie) were also used sparingly--Snorlax has a decent 14 battles, but the other two combined had half as many battles as Infernape. Infernape had both a huge win rate and lots of battles.
The chart also shows the unfortunate side effect of one Pokémon being so dominant, as around half Ash's DP party has a 50% win rate or below and Pikachu was well below his batting average.

Here's a link for those who haven't seen it:
Edit: Didn't notice until now; interesting Pikachu has the same number of battles in gens 2, 4, and 6. Also looks like gen 6 shot his average win number up quite a bit.
 
Last edited:
The think the chart of all Ash's Pokémon's win rates can support this idea; most of the Pokémon with a higher win rate than Infernape (Krookodile, Snorlax, Glalie) were also used sparingly--Snorlax has a decent 14 battles, but the other two combined had half as many battles as Infernape. Infernape had both a huge win rate and lots of battles.
The chart also shows the unfortunate side effect of one Pokémon being so dominant, as around half Ash's DP party has a 50% win rate or below and Pikachu was well below his batting average.

Here's a link for those who haven't seen it:
Edit: Didn't notice until now; interesting Pikachu has the same number of battles in gens 2, 4, and 6. Also looks like gen 6 shot his average win number up quite a bit.
I feel weird talking about the same thing I've said before, but the same topics seem to come up frequently here. Although I find this chart really interesting (props to whomever took all that time) it really shouldn't be used as the main piece of evidence when trying to determine which Pokemon was stronger/a better battler. There are so many other issues present, such as quality of opponent, cumulative improvement over time, quality of strategy, how the Pokemon was doing at that time (the anime doesn't really touch on this too often - of course in the games its irrelevant - but every once in a while a Pokemon will just struggle because of an ailment or other issue particular to that day - something I think would be cool for them to touch on even more because it makes it more realistic), an opponent's particular strategy, battlefield issues, matchup issues, how serious the battle was, if the battle was even really completed, the list goes on and on [ EDIT: I wanted to add beating a Pokemon that was already weakened by someone else and vice versa]. I think the chart is still useful and cool to see, and I think it can be used to help justify a conclusion, but simple w/l% doesn't come close to telling the whole story. Quick example, Charizard curb stomping Casey's Pokemon (that literally counted as 3 wins for Charizard; pidgey, rattata, and Chikorita, which can be seen on the google doc list) isn't really a big accomplishment, Grovyle losing to Elite 4 Drake's Altaria wasn't really a bad loss.

That being said, I don't disagree that Infernape is one of the strongest, if the not the strongest Pokemon Ash had. One key aspect of the w/l% though is that Ash didn't have Chimchar when it was a beginner, Paul trained it a lot, so a lot of the early lesson losses had already taken place. On the contrary, Treeko had a lot of losses where it gained a lot of experience, learned a lot of lessons, and improved. Treeko also chose to battle against very tough opponents, and was frequently Ash's go to in tough battles. I'm not saying Sceptile is stronger than Infernape (I don't think that is true), but just saying Sceptile is a lot better than its simple w/l%.

Seeing Gliscor dead last, I doubt anyone feels Gliscor is Ash's weakest battler, but it certainly had to learn a lot because it wasn't much of a battler at first, and it also had its off screen training, so it simply isn't just the worst because its w/l% is lowest. On the whole, some series had tougher competition than others, and showed more difficult battles - which relates to the poster we saw last year about Ash's win% by region, in which his lowest win %s were Sinnoh and Kalos, places you may not guess, but it was due to having more competitive battles, which leads to lower win %s for his Pokemon, but also more development and improvement in the long run. Losses aren't always bad, frequently losses lead to more improvements than wins do. I don't really agree that the DP team suffered (at least not too much) because of Infernape, I actually think that whole team was fairly good (at least compared to other full teams), they just took part in more difficult battles than some others that get higher on the list. I would say Kalos team suffered more due to Greninja, because a lot of development was ignored, especially once bond-phenomenon was a thing.
 
Last edited:
The chart's not perfect, yeah, since there are factors like opponent quality or Pokémon that clearly improve after a certain point.
For instance, Tailow lost just about every battle we saw him fight (even losing to Drew, a coordinator rather than battle specialist, with a type advantage), but after evolving became a beast.

On the whole, some series had tougher competition than others, and showed more difficult battles - which relates to the poster we saw last year about Ash's win% by region, in which his lowest win %s were Sinnoh and Kalos, places you may not guess, but it was due to having more competitive battles, which leads to lower win %s for his Pokemon, but also more development and improvement in the long run.
Funny thing is; I remember a lot of people were surprised by Sinnoh having his lowest winrate but I wasn't; when it was new I was actually annoyed how much he was losing, since it felt like the Battle Frontier hadn't meant anything for his development as a trainer.
(My "controversial opinion" is that other than Tobias DP didn't really have a generally higher competition level than AG. Looks how much worse Paul's team did VS Brandon than Ash's AG team. That said I had this argument a decade ago and I think it mostly comes down to how you interpret certain things so I'm not going to argue strongly for it).
 
I don't understand that whole "Kukui and Burnet are Satoshi's true father and mother" thing in the fandom. His relationship with Kukui is not anything special other than the surprising mentor-rival angle and he barely interacted with Burnet. What makes it worst is that even the show began to push it like it was the case.
 
I don't really agree that the DP team suffered (at least not too much) because of Infernape, I actually think that whole team was fairly good (at least compared to other full teams), they just took part in more difficult battles than some others that get higher on the list.
I completely agree with this. My opinion is that the DP team (including Gible as well) is Ash's strongest and most balanced + well-rounded team in the entire anime. The low win rate is due to the tougher battles they faced, even through which they got a decent amount of development and progression.
None of the Sinnoh Pokemon got "jobbed" exactly, not even Torterra when you think about it since he lost against some seriously strong opponents like Bertha's Hippowdon and Paul's Drapion, both of which were the respective trainers aces (and the trainers themselves were not pushovers).
Since the new series seems to have similar art style to Sun & Moon, I wonder if we're going to get any hypocrites who like it here despite hating it in Sun & Moon?
Honestly, it looks far more like XY with how detailed the environments are drawn. The only part of SM are the smoother/softer ways the characters are drawn.
 
Last edited:
Since the new series seems to have similar art style to Sun & Moon, I wonder if we're going to get any hypocrites who like it here despite hating it in Sun & Moon?

I mean, like I said before, all that “SM has a terrible art style” talk was really just them saying “Ash (and Team Rocket) look awful!” I never saw anyone complain about the other characters.

Thankfully, these new designs seem to be a happy medium between SM’s and the previous seasons’, so we shouldn’t see too much of that anymore.
 
I mean, like I said before, all that “SM has a terrible art style” talk was really just them saying “Ash (and Team Rocket) look awful!” I never saw anyone complain about the other characters.

Thankfully, these new designs seem to be a happy medium between SM’s and the previous seasons’, so we shouldn’t see too much of that anymore.
I hope they tone down on the meme faces to once every 10 episodes or so. They lost their value after 10-20 episodes into SM for me and just became exhaustive. Compare that to the meme faces in DP, BW and XY, those were funny because how uncommon they were and their sudden appearance was hilarious. Here's a good example from XY.
5d0.jpg
 
I hope they tone down on the meme faces to once every 10 episodes or so. They lost their value after 10-20 episodes into SM for me and just became exhaustive. Compare that to the meme faces in DP, BW and XY, those were funny because how uncommon they were and their sudden appearance was hilarious. Here's a good example from XY.
5d0.jpg
Yea, one YouTuber in his reviews of the episodes kept a count of the meme faces. By episode 128, it was up to 2941. That is averaging at almost 23 times an episode. If that isn’t excessive use of a joke to ad nauseam, I don’t know what is.
 
Since the new series seems to have similar art style to Sun & Moon, I wonder if we're going to get any hypocrites who like it here despite hating it in Sun & Moon?

I think that I've already seen that. Nothing so far reminds me of XY visually, but the character designs do seem like a more polished version of SM than anything else, especially Ash and Team Rocket. Honestly, I think that the complaints about the SM visuals or "meme faces" are a bit exaggerated. It probably helps that it doesn't bother me too much in general, but it never really seemed like a big deal to me when those kind of facial expressions would only show up for a brief gag most of the time. Granted, I can understand being annoyed if the facial expressions take you out of the episode or are just plain unfunny, but the over the top facial expressions don't come to mind when I think of SM.
 
I hope they tone down on the meme faces to once every 10 episodes or so. They lost their value after 10-20 episodes into SM for me and just became exhaustive. Compare that to the meme faces in DP, BW and XY, those were funny because how uncommon they were and their sudden appearance was hilarious. Here's a good example from XY.
5d0.jpg

...that...happened...in X AND Y? Really?

Wow. I did not remember that. Feels like something I would, considering I remember a lot of the meme faces from SM.
 
I can remember these cartoony reaction frames going at least as far back as AG, where Iwane and Tamagawa used to use them. Don't ask me about BW, but otherwise I'm pretty sure it's just a case of their frequency of usage and variety of types going up each series.
 
Back
Top Bottom