Red
The Best There Is
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2010
- Messages
- 208
- Reaction score
- 8
Yes, writers are comfortable with stagnation, but that doesn't make it okay. Ash is effectively a new character every generation, a completely blank slate, why they still use the name and image, I don't know. The Pokemon Adventures manga survives just fine with new protagonists, and it's never too late to breathe new life or take healthy risks in an established franchise.
I never said that it was okay. It's just the way it is. The difference with Pokemon Adventures and the anime is that they started having new protagonists with each generation starting with the second generation. Starting that so early, as opposed to sixteen years later, makes the change far less jarring. It worked fine with Pokemon Adventures and if they had started that around either the second or third generation, since Johto was still part of the original series, for the anime, then it probably would have turned out fine. I do think that it's far too late to replace Ash. There's no reason for them to take a huge risk like that with changing an iconic character with some new character. It doesn't matter that Ash is a blank slate each series or that it is stagnant. If the anime is still doing well and more importantly, the merchandise is still selling, then they aren't going to even consider doing that.
Quirky Circuit said:I want to see a new protagonist, not because of the handling of Ash, I don't care about that, but because they already treat him like someone new anyway. And I think that's lazy, especially since the brand doesn't revolve around him. He ain't the Bruce Wayne of this franchise, he isn't the face on toy boxes or game boxes, or manga. It's always something different, so I say take the risk.
Again, they won't do it, japanese animation is a revolving door, nothing ever really changes with any of their properties. Yoda says it best;
"You must learn to let go-"
I can understand wanting a new protagonist and while he isn't the Bruce Wayne of the franchise, he is still used in most of the merchandise for the anime. I still see Ash figures, although usually only at the start of a series, he's on Pokemon books for younger readers along with his other frineds and I think on clothes as well. He's not the face of the whole franchise like Pikachu is, but he is the face of the anime. Being the protagonist for so long is a significant reason, if not the main reason, that they aren't going to replace him.
It was more of a statement toward the animation crew, they "think it's okay". Obviously they do, because they've stuck with the same protagonist. And it's not jarring if you treated the property as intended; it is for children, and about every three-four years we get a new generation, and therefore a new protagonist, so it isn't jarring as new kids are the priority, and they would have no idea about Ol' Ash Ketchum. I simply don't see it as so significant to keep him around. The kids who grow up will reflect and desire a new protagonist, 'cause they're getting older, and new kids would have someone that's actually new (instead of only sort of) to root for.
And, hey, I see Ash figures on the shelf too. They're peg warmers around here, no kid is buying Ash.