i think the closest thing we will ever get to a BOTW Pokemon is pokeparkThat was in regard to a Neogaf post about People wanting Pokémon BOTW.
I don't want to live on this planet anymore
But after that i also said changes can be good, trail and ride pokemon are not big as battle system change, but you just keep ignoring it and keep saying that i don't want changes at all.Then do yourself a favour and re-read our actual discussion. I have quoted you numerous times on what your literal statement was. Obviously, a change to the battle system is big, however, you literally said why should they change anything at all if after 22 years they are still making money. Besides, some of the changes I mentioned are big. You originally never implied why change the battle system specifically, but why change anything in general. Hence my original comment.
It was?That was in regard to a Neogaf post about People wanting Pokémon BOTW.
Just because the system is more powerful doesn't mean that they have to change everything. This would be change for the sake of change, and I don't think that's a good idea.Now, talking specifically about the battle system (which you should have specified from the beginning), there are numerous reasons why they might want to change it. Pokemon is now moving from handheld consoles to handheld/home consoles. We are now getting Pokemon on home console power. They have potential to create more changes with these newest games than all other changes combined. So why not freshen it up? A real time battle system would be difficult to implement with hundreds and hundreds of Pokemon on a handheld, but on a home console? much more possible.
Yep, they were shown some popular online comments about people wanting a huge open world Pokemon game with a similar scope to BOTW and they replied in the interview not to expect something quite so drastic.It was?
I don't really think you should expect something like that anyways. Just because it's made for a home console does not mean that it will have a large open world, real time battles, and all that stuff.Yep, they were shown some popular online comments about people wanting a huge open world Pokemon game with a similar scope to BOTW and they replied in the interview not to expect something quite so drastic.
I've been reading this forum the past few nights and just last night when I went to sleep, I dreamt that Gamefreak and TPCi announced both new games, forgot what was the title, but both cover Legendaries had interchangeable forms (kinda like slide evolution from digimon?) and there was game footage. And in my dream, they announced a remake of Pokemon Yellow for 3DS/2DS.While I was napping, I had a dream zeraora was revealed
Actually it wouldnt be change for the sake of change, it would be progress. Since the begining they have been trying to make things more lively and real. When color finally came out, sprites where no longer colourless. Then sprites gradually improved and finally in Black and White they where animated. Then X and Y made the leap to 3D models and since its been future proofed, it is likely to stay. Right now graphics in Pokemon are at its peak, they cant progress much farther with it (unless they want to make super realistic models), now its time to make battles more lively. They did that with weather and terrain, then in X and Y with in battle form changes, then in Sun and Moon with super flashy moves. Dropping the turn based system would be the next step and would create a much more lively Pokemon...Just because the system is more powerful doesn't mean that they have to change everything. This would be change for the sake of change, and I don't think that's a good idea.
I agree. There's no need. Just take the best Pokemon games we've had so far, put all their best features and content together, and do a little upscaling and new content.I don't really think you should expect something like that anyways. Just because it's made for a home console does not mean that it will have a large open world, real time battles, and all that stuff.
Zera-OraIs it Ze-roar-a or Zera-Ora?
That's not comparable, because graphic changes are purely aesthetic, while changes to the battle system alter gameplay mechanics. There's a difference between changing a black-and-white film to a color film and changing a comedy film to a horror film, for example.Right now graphics in Pokemon are at its peak, they cant progress much farther with it (unless they want to make super realistic models), now its time to make battles more lively. They did that with weather and terrain, then in X and Y with in battle form changes, then in Sun and Moon with super flashy moves. Dropping the turn based system would be the next step and would create a much more lively Pokemon...
Just because the system is more powerful doesn't mean that they have to change everything. This would be change for the sake of change, and I don't think that's a good idea.
But after that i also said changes can be good, trail and ride pokemon are not big as battle system change, but you just keep ignoring it and keep saying that i don't want changes at all.
and where did i said " don't change ANYTHING"? i can't recall that one...
Wow, that was amazing, it saved me a lot of work. Thanks for summarizing.
But just out of curiosity: does anyone noticed something missing in this summary about the Italian translator leak?
edit: corrected the sentence.
I don't really think you should expect something like that anyways. Just because it's made for a home console does not mean that it will have a large open world, real time battles, and all that stuff.
no i didn't, i said "SOMETHING that gives you ton of money for 22 years", you changed just to prove your point.. wow.I ignored the rest of what you said because it was unrelated to my actual argument. Once again, I'll quote you. " Why change ANYTHING that makes them a ton of money for 22 years." That is what your quote said, and that is specifically what I have been referencing this entire time. The rest of your argument has nothing to do with it. I understand you added more to it afterwards, but that is not what I am discussing.
I can compete with it because i'm using logic, why change something that gives you ton of money for 22 years?