- Oct 24, 2015
- Reaction score
Let wait for E3 in next Mouth maybe Nintendo announce Pokémon Gen 4 remakes also Stars on both 3DS & Switch plus Classic Gen 2 on Virtual Console.
Woah, that a bit much, they can only release one game a year, it could be either Diamond/Pearl Remake or Stars. As for Gold/Silver/Crystal Virtual Console, they can release this year or next year. But having all that in one year is a bit too much IMO.Let wait for E3 in next Mouth maybe Nintendo announce Pokémon Gen 4 remakes also Stars on both 3DS & Switch plus Classic Gen 2 on Virtual Console.
Which, since RS were remade with ORAS, has become the oldest game and next in line for a "remake." This is the first time that the next game "in line" is itself a remake.But we already have remake of Red/Blue
This is exactly what I've been saying. I'm actually not arguing for a remake. That would be silly tbh, especially with the Virtual Console release last year. Talk about boring. But I believe a Kanto revisit in the form of SM sequels or something like that is likely. And, it would follow that this SM sequel in Kanto would also function as like a "20 years later" sequel for Kanto. Perfect, right?Now they can do a Kanto/Johto reboot/remaster, that would be better. Since the 20th movie points to the possible next and a lot of hints and reference from Sun/Moon, it's likely possible.
This year is actually Diamond and Pearl's 11th anniversary, not 10th. Besides, ORAS came out during the 12th anniversary year of RS, whereas HGSS were the 10th anniversary. I'm honestly expecting DP remakes in 2019 (5 years after ORAS) or 2020 (their 14th anniversary).As for Diamond/Pearl, okay yes it's the 10th anniversary of Diamond/Pearl, and yes it's time for remake.
There were a lot of references and hints to every past region--but Kanto had way more than the rest (including Sinnoh).In Sun/Moon, we have a lot of reference and hints toward Sinnoh
Obviously we'll have to agree to disagree on this. I've said time and time again how these cameos likely don't matter at all when there are references to the whole series, again with Kanto in the lead as usual. (Not saying I like it, but it's true). Besides, there is no way they would do DP remakes on the 3DS. If nothing else, DPPt are still playable on 3DS.along with 20th movie showing popular pokemon, Piplup and Lucario (also Luxray because of the toys, so he'll likely to appear in the movie also). With those hints and reference is a possibility of a Sinnoh Remake next.
I don't believe anybody is doing this that I recall... we're just debating different opinions, observations, and ideas.It could go either way, but demanding it, is not going to help. The one person says "Kanto needs more than Sinnoh because it's the 20th anniversary" and the person says "Sinnoh need more because it's didn't get it remake, so Sinnoh is more demanding than Kanto". See demanding the games and fighting over it is not going to help.
RBY released on Virtual Console and we got Sun/Moon on 3DS in the same year (2016).Woah, that a bit much, they can only release one game a year, it could be either Diamond/Pearl Remake or Stars. As for Gold/Silver/Crystal Virtual Console, they can release this year or next year. But having all that in one year is a bit too much IMO.
Well, they did just use Hoopa to give us all the Legendaries in ORAS, so I can see them doing that again. Especially because of the Beasts, Reshiram, Zekrom, Kyurem, Xerneas, Yveltal, and if not in Gen 7, the Tapus.How would you think a potential Gen 4 remake might handled those legendaries (and a side story centering on Giratina and a Gen 4 mythical should they consider that?)
I agree. Hoopa portals are by far the best option. They could place Hoopa portals in random post-game locations, and then, as a reward for capturing every legendary from Hoopa's portals, you could then battle and capture Hoopa. Win/Win.Well, they did just use Hoopa to give us all the Legendaries in ORAS, so I can see them doing that again. Especially because of the Beasts, Reshiram, Zekrom, Kyurem, Xerneas, Yveltal, and if not in Gen 7, the Tapus.
Cosmog, the UBs, and Necrozma could be thrown in a UB quest if it isn't in Gen 7. They're not restricted to one place after all.
I'm still disappointed ORAS didn't actually do something with Hoopa in-game, especially since they used his portals in the game. Maybe in the future, though.They could place Hoopa portals in random post-game locations, and then, as a reward for capturing every legendary from Hoopa's portals, you could then battle and capture Hoopa.
I think the idea is fine for Legendaries that are supposed to be one-of-a-kind (Groudon & co, Dialga & co, Reshiram & co, Xerneas & co), don't have a reason to be active at the time (Reshiram/Zekrom should've been in their Light/Dark Stones if Hoopa didn't mess around), can't travel across the ocean (Entei/Raikou, the Musketeers), and whatever else.Don't really like the idea of Hoopa portals, I never did. They're just too phoned in and lazy. I'm fine with Ultra Space portals for UBs, but regular legendaries generally have more lore and backstory behind them so just randomly cramming them in places with no explanation feels like an injustice.
I wouldn't call RSE recent. ORAS yes, but not RSE. And the ship has already sailed considering we're discussing the potential remake of games where the villain already had designs on the local Legendary pokemon.I've complained about this before, I don't like how recently, the franchise has been using legendaries as gimmicks. The biggest offender is Pokémon Super Mystery Dungeon, where "Legendary Pokémon™ and Mythical Pokémon™ (are trademarks of The Pokémon Company © 1995 - 2015. All rights reserved.) are turning into stone", because that apparently makes the stakes inherently high. /rant
My point is, I don't like shoving legendaries into everything because usually, they don't actually do anything.