- Joined
- Oct 18, 2012
- Messages
- 8,022
- Reaction score
- 22,096
Isn't GF indeed muddying up this so-called readily apparent, consistent, useful style of categorization with how they went from introducing incompatible new forms to completely new Pokemon? Especially since this generation thing was never something official nor cast in stone. I just think that holding on to our assumptions of what makes a generation is no longer useful since GF is doing almost everything to tear up this allegedly rule book the fans have been swearing by. So yes I accept that XY and SM are indeed of different generations, I just don't think arguments on what GF can or cannot do based on generation lines hold any more.
I agree with the last line of your post - GF can kind of do whatever they like in terms of adding new things for the second game in a generation, but that doesn't change the hard-coded transfer-based divisions between generations. Those are still distinct and still make it clear which is which.
(And yes, I know Gens 1 and 2 actually break that rule, but that was early days when they didn't have any sort of formal process nailed down. Those two generations are full of early-installment weirdness - I mean, a ton of the Pokémon that were introduced in Gen 2 were actually probably meant to have been introduced in Gen 1. They weren't even really expecting to make more Pokémon games after GS, or at least, they figured the franchise would just naturally fizzle out after then.)