tyguy723
I gotta do things my own way darling...
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2012
- Messages
- 362
- Reaction score
- 679
What would be bad. Could you how any type of evidence to back this claim. Obviously it could be taken as an opinion, but honestly, what is the detriment to Kalos if Pokemon are added? The new list was bare bone and the smallest we've ever gotten, anything added could salvage the region to be more fleshed out with its population.Maybe but they aren't going to put new pokemon in the middle or in th last game of the current gen. It is a bad decision and new pokemon should only be introduced in a whole new generation.
You keep stating that they HAVE to be at the start of a new generation, but Masada is all about change and surprise now. ANYTHING is literally possible, so to go by precedence isn't as valid anymore. One might have said before the Unova sequels they couldn't do it simply vacate they never did and that a third legendary in a trio meant Gray HAD to happen...but then we got a reality check: it didn't have to happen and we did get sequels and the pattern was broken. So don't just state that because A happened in the past, B & C are to follow...it's a different point now in the series to take a risk and change.