Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I think it will be a new Mystery Dungeon. It's way too early to reveal Gen 6 Pokemon, and I think they would keep Gen 5 on the DS and start Gen 6 on the 3DS.
Don't be so sure. Misty got her Togepi way before Gen.2 came out. And Ho-oh made her first appearance in the first episode. Of the first generation's anime.
No, Generation III didn't need GS remakes. Instead, though, it released remakes for Generation I, and put more Johto Pokemon in Emerald's Safari Zone.
Granted, PokéPark was better than Dash and Channel, but that still doesn't make it a great game. Maybe if it had multiplayer...Edit: PokePark is awesome when you compare it to the other Pikachu games. It's the best one by far. Hey You Pikachu and Channel were among the worst, Dash is somewhere in the middle, and PokePark is actually above average since you play as Pikachu in a more adventure like game. You can even beat up a Groudon and Darkrai in it for crying out loud.
It's pretty much been confirmed that the DS and 3DS will be able to communicate wirelessly. Otherwise, how are we supposed to use the already confirmed feature to send our DSiWare over?When games were on both the Xbox 1 and the 360, they couldn't cross link, unless the xbox 1 game was on the 360 in the BC emulator. And DS games didn't have multiplayer with the GBA, only password sharing for PMD RB.
It probably won't happen. And Grey will not be a 3ds game.
Considering the 3DS has already had more pre-orders than the Wii had, and the shortages the Wii had.I hope 3DS doesn't do well after a few months.
don't get me wrong I don't want nintendo to fail. but it is such a gimmick. all they are gonna do is rehash old games and make them 3D so you have to buy them again.
and as for the pokemon game. I highly doubt they would make a main game just for the 3DS. it would be like shooting themselves in the foot. the next new main series game will have some 3d aspects but will still be playable on the other ds's
I hope 3DS doesn't do well after a few months.
don't get me wrong I don't want nintendo to fail. but it is such a gimmick. all they are gonna do is rehash old games and make them 3D so you have to buy them again.
and as for the pokemon game. I highly doubt they would make a main game just for the 3DS. it would be like shooting themselves in the foot. the next new main series game will have some 3d aspects but will still be playable on the other ds's
RSEmakes RSEmakes RSEmakes RSEmakes RSEmakes RSEmakes -bricked-
I'm hoping for RSEmakes or a new Mystery Dungeon. D8 Either one would make me have a heart attack from the sheer awesomeness of having two great Pokemon games have a 3DS.
When games were on both the Xbox 1 and the 360, they couldn't cross link, unless the xbox 1 game was on the 360 in the BC emulator. And DS games didn't have multiplayer with the GBA, only password sharing for PMD RB.
It probably won't happen. And Grey will not be a 3ds game.
Not to mention, DS to 3DS communication has been confirmed. There is a confirmed feature that lets us transfer our DSiWare to the 3DS.
No doubt people have remembered this already, but G/S could still be played on a GB. Crystal was GBC only.
And yes, the DSi uses more or less the same communication as the DS, so 3DS <=> DS(i) will be possible. I'm hoping for Grey (or whatever they call it, I doubt it's going to be Pink version) to be 3DS exclusive (as by that time, I'll actually have one).
The best way to raise sales for the 3DS is to release the Generation VI main versions sooner rather than later, which is to say in 2013. More than half of Pokémon players don't even bother with the third versions, and being required to buy a new system just for that kind of game is unlikely to change their minds.I hadn't thought of that before. Now that you mention it, I also kinda hope it turns out that way. Talk about a great way to raise sales for the 3DS, considering how popular the third version is likely to be.
How so?
GameFreak said in interviews regarding Black and White that their biggest problem was having it on the same console as Generation IV, and making it feel different. There's that reason why they won't move Gen V onto the 3DS, and there's also:
- Pokémon Ruby and Sapphire came out 2 years after the launch of the Gameboy Advance.
- Pokémon Diamond and Pearl came out 2 years after the launch of the Nintendo DS.
- The Nintendo 3DS is due out in Japan later this month (2011); so going by that pattern, the first 3DS main series title should be out in 2013.
- The next main series Pokémon game is expected in 2012, as previous trends have shown.
So it's pretty logical that 2012 will see BW's third version, which will be the final Nintendo DS Pokémon title. Generation VI will then begin on the 3DS in 2013 (Thus, making Generation V as long as Generation I).
Simples.
Except, FRLG's early release was most likely a reference to the original Red and Green being released in the first quarter of the year (RG being February 1996, FRLG being January 2004), as their September-November release month has consistently been the same for all of Generation III (bar that, obviously) and Gen IV. Heck, since Emerald, all games have been released in September. Also, except for Crystal's December release, the Sep-Nov release month has been there since Blue and Yellow.
With the order; obviously, if we were going to get the third version and RS(3?)DS in the same generation, it could be in either order. However, if we go under the assumption that Gen V will end with the next game, it makes more sense to save RS(3?)DS for Generation VI.
Half the people here seem to be supporting what would be a 2-year-long generation. What the hell, man? We just got more Pokemon than we know what to do with, and you guys think we only get two years to play with them?
I think we're going to get RSEmakes and the third version this gen. Perhaps, they'll be like Generation II's release schedule (ie; 3rd version on newer console), and, likely, if they mimic what they did in Generation III, we'd get the RSEmakes on the DS/DSi.
You'll probably get death then atm, as this is obviously a spin-off title xD
The best way to raise sales for the 3DS is to release the Generation VI main versions sooner rather than later, which is to say in 2013. More than half of Pokémon players don't even bother with the third versions, and being required to buy a new system just for that kind of game is unlikely to change their minds.
The best way to raise sales for the 3DS is to release the Generation VI main versions sooner rather than later, which is to say in 2013. More than half of Pokémon players don't even bother with the third versions, and being required to buy a new system just for that kind of game is unlikely to change their minds.
Three years is not a short period by any stretch of the imagination.No thats pretty illogical, that would make this generation so unbelievably short, we'd back in the generation 1 days.
There is no pattern. It took 8 years for Red and Green, but HGSS were released six years after FRLG, meaning that the gap between the remakes was longer than any generational gap. If Game Freak want to continue releasing remakes but at a slower rate than new games (which makes more sense than arbitrarily stuffing them into every generation), then this generation won't have any remakes.Also remakes tend to happen 10 years after their initial release meaning RSE remakes are due for 2013 in Japan, 2014 in the rest of the world, which gives them just enough time to slot in Grey or whatever in 2012.
No. I don't know how many times I will have to say this, but Gold and Silver were not released for the Game Boy; unlike with Black and White, Game Freak chose to delay Gold and Silver by almost two years so they could benefit from the GBC. See here for details.Most likely RSEmakes and Grey will be on the 3DS as Crystal was on GBC when GS were on GB but with colour on GBA.
We're merely saying that Game Freak do not seem to be in any hurry to move onto the 3DS. If they were to release the third version and remakes for the 3DS, that might delay Generation VI to 2014, but it would give Game Freak little time to familiarize themselves with the 3DS.Exactly, its like we've just got a newborn baby, and Ryu Soji and others are already planning the poor guys funeral. Heck the babys not even been born in USA and EU yet, and Ryu Soji is planning the funeral.
It would be unusual if Game Freak released a new game this year, as four consecutive releases have never been done before. The only reason they'd be in a hurry to release the third version is if they wanted to release the last DS game as soon as possible.Oh yeah, its really obvious??? If its your opinion, then it must be correct, how silly of me to think otherwise. It could be a spin off, Ranger 4, or some new title, but its not what I'd call obvious, theres a good chance for it to be something like Grey for the 3DS.
The statistics speak for themselves: The best-selling third version was Yellow, and even that game reached less than 50% of its predecessors' game sales. In the most recent case, Platinum's sales are roughly 41% of the figure for Diamond and Pearl.Actually, quite a lot only go for the 3rd version as its widely considered the best one, and it'd be a perfect way to launch the 3DS, with the Gen 5 game part 3 on the 3DS, with like BW, but all new 3D features etc.
The best way to raise sales for the 3DS is to release the Generation VI main versions sooner rather than later, which is to say in 2013. More than half of Pokémon players don't even bother with the third versions, and being required to buy a new system just for that kind of game is unlikely to change their minds.