- Joined
- Jun 5, 2016
- Messages
- 11,647
- Reaction score
- 26,882
Well, it’s just one in an example of many. The rest of my post highlights the nuance well. You just took the Grookey point out of context and painted my post as something it isn’t. I wrote a paragraph of constructive Go criticism and you focus on the one exaggerated point.This seems like a super disengenuous explanation of what ACTUALLY happened between him and Grookey. The dream was just a silly comedic opener for when he wakes up and meets the real deal. And watching the episode they pretty clearly explain where it came from and how he got there, there was conflict, and a actual effort had to be made to actually obtain said Pokémon, it wasn't just a flick of the rist and bam Grookey was his
Like part of what makes these criticisms of Goh hard to sympathize with at times is when people take these innocuous moments and deliberately interpret them in the worst possible ways imaginable when it's really not that deep.
Last edited: