- Joined
- Jun 5, 2016
- Messages
- 11,647
- Reaction score
- 26,882
I don’t see it as something that needs to be commended? They’re charging less for an inferior service... It's not something noble or something we should be "grateful" of when they decide to charge less for a subpar service.Isn't that usually how that works though? The inferior service costs less? I know the larger argument here is if it should cost anything, but still, EonLover's point seems to hold up to me: Switch Online isn't as robust as the other consoles' online services, so at least they're not charging an equal amount.