- Joined
- Sep 5, 2012
- Messages
- 20,845
- Reaction score
- 17,461
Which one is more cuter, better looking, or useful (your own taste), Whimsicott or Lilligant? (or both)
-
Hey Trainers! Be sure to check out Corsola Beach, our newest section on the forums, in partnership with our friends at Corsola Cove! At the Beach, you can discuss the competitive side of the games, post your favorite Pokemon memes, and connect with other Pokemon creators!
-
Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.
Contest Lilligant vs. Whimsicott
- Thread starter Chidamari Sketch
- Start date
Dr. Buni
Take me away from here...
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2010
- Messages
- 5,611
- Reaction score
- 85
Which one is cuter? Whimsicott, hands down. I am sure the concept of cuteness was created after looking at Whimsicott. Better looking? Once again, I will go with Whimsicott, I never thought a Pokémon supposedly based on Vegetable Lamb of Tartary could look so good and cute. As of usefulness, well, the little elf isn't very useful for in-game purposes, but isn't it a goddess among the annoyers? I am sure it is pretty useful, but since I play only in-game, I will go with Lilligant, she was the second strongest Pokémon in one of my teams. Sleep Powder + Quiver Dance + Energy Ball = Win.
tl;dr:
Cuteness appeal: Whimsicott
Appearance/Design: Whimsicott
Usefulness: Lilligant
I choose Whimsicott. It is pretty, useful and I love the concept Game Freak used to create it, but Lilligant ain't bad either. Grass-type ftw.
tl;dr:
Cuteness appeal: Whimsicott
Appearance/Design: Whimsicott
Usefulness: Lilligant
I choose Whimsicott. It is pretty, useful and I love the concept Game Freak used to create it, but Lilligant ain't bad either. Grass-type ftw.
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
