Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We DO have forum blogs for opinions too...
I think part of a lot of people's problems is that the bulbaNEWS feed is put to bulbaPEDIA, including the editorials. so, people not necessarily interested in the non-news sections of the bulbanews website still see it on the main page of bulbapedia. if it is true that bulbanews is meant to be able to stand on its own feet as "your community Pokémon newspaper" as well as part of the bulbagarden network, then not necessarily all of bulbanews's stuff belongs on the main page of bulbapedia.
Im confused why is everyone making such a big deal about this article??
Well, at least someone managed to tell me what the article was addressing since I was kind of confused by it, I thought it was just stating what we can all plainly see.The reason why everyone is arguing about this article is ironically the same reason that the article was written in the first place: people have a general idea on what Pokémon/Bulbapedia is about, but any real deviation from the "orignal idea" and they get annoyed that it doesn't seem to "fit" with the rest.
The reason why everyone is arguing about this article is ironically the same reason that the article was written in the first place: people have a general idea on what Pokémon/Bulbapedia is about, but any real deviation from the "orignal idea" and they get annoyed that it doesn't seem to "fit" with the rest.
That's not our problem at all. Our problem is the article is the same thing we've read on Bulbanews several times before and at this point it's just making this experiment into editorials counterproductive. We want to read things that interest us, not the same thing reiterated by a half-dozen different people.The reason why everyone is arguing about this article is ironically the same reason that the article was written in the first place: people have a general idea on what Pokémon/Bulbapedia is about, but any real deviation from the "orignal idea" and they get annoyed that it doesn't seem to "fit" with the rest.
That's not our problem at all. Our problem is the article is the same thing we've read on Bulbanews several times before and at this point it's just making this experiment into editorials counterproductive. We want to read things that interest us, not the same thing reiterated by a half-dozen different people.
That's not our problem at all. Our problem is the article is the same thing we've read on Bulbanews several times before and at this point it's just making this experiment into editorials counterproductive. We want to read things that interest us, not the same thing reiterated by a half-dozen different people.
This is something like the third or fourth article I've read covering this general issue. If no one had said anything I wouldn't be surprised if more came.That's true as well, but look at it this way: Now that an offical article about the subject has been written, don't expect a similar one in the near future.
This is something like the third or fourth article I've read covering this general issue. If no one had said anything I wouldn't be surprised if more came.
HeartGold and SoulSilver- a return to form or a lazy rehash?Coming from somebody who doesn't know anything about this, what were the two or three that you read before this one?
I agree with this article just stating observations that, if you are active in this fandom, you would have noticed and wouldn't need to read. The writer didn't really post an opinion, and the article is only really interesting to those not of the fandom (assuming they were interested in the first place). It doesn't help that it seems like a plug-in to advertise their blog that I don't want to read considering how the article was written.HeartGold and SoulSilver- a return to form or a lazy rehash?
Generation III: Criticized too often?
Generation IV: A look back
Black & White; first impressions
At their most basic, each of these editorials are essentially comparing the newer generations to the older. Sometimes the older generations are treated favorably, sometimes not. Moreover, now counting this latest editorial, there appears to be a downward trend in the substance of the articles premiered: originally fairly intellectual and in-depth towards this final article that gets right to the point: a plain observation on things we all know.
I just want to read something more than this topic. Yeah, we get it, the older generations were good/bad and HeartGold and SoulSilver/Black and White have a lot riding on them. A lot more can be said about the Pokemon fandom and the franchise in general than this.
For the record, this article was mainly intended to be an introduction to the column, which will discuss the new features of Black and White and speculate on them.
This. My friend and I laughed at this... It was almost blatant. The guy wasn't even a member over here. It would be nice for someone actually active in this community to speak, though I don't know the specifics.It doesn't help that it seems like a plug-in to advertise their blog that I don't want to read considering how the article was written.
Well, if that's the case, I'll reserve judgment until I see more of it, but I feel speculation is best kept on the forums since we're able to respond to each other.
This. My friend and I laughed at this... It was almost blatant. The guy wasn't even a member over here. It would be nice for someone actually active in this community to speak, though I don't know the specifics.