Really? Hard to think that there's any ill-intent behind simply not releasing a teaser to every single person in every single language. More like they have their focus set on their own version right now.Seriously Nintendo, why do you even try keeping one region in the dark in this digital age?
I know what he means, but this little clause right here caused me to giggle a bit.Every single battle in the game was a double battle.
Doubles weren't forced that much. For a new feature, they weren't used as much as they should have been.On the positive side, it looks like triple battles won't be forced as much as double battles were in RS.
I didn't actually play RSE. That was just what I've heard.Doubles weren't forced that much. For a new feature, they weren't used as much as they should have been.
And Emerald added many battles which could be turned into Doubles.
I remember reading that when double battles were created tehre is some information in the games that could have made posible carrying more pokemon, i am really enthusiastic at the idea of triple battles specially because of the strategy, it could have been a great risk but i think it is a great victoryI'm actually can't wait to see what they do with Triple battles. Will we be allowed to carry more POkemon? Will we be able to have more moves? There are tons of possibilities with this. Hopefully we'll see many of them come to life.
What a horrible thing to say! Who wouldn't want their writings read by people? People who like it, people who don't like it; people who care, people who don't care; people with an opinion, people without one. I'm sure it doesn't matter to the author as long as it's being read.Again, if it doesn't look like anything that doesn't interest you, don't read it.
I haven't been told that for quite some time, but feel free to continue being needlessly dismissive.Considering how people think you phrase all your posts as facts when they are opinion, I didn't think I'd get a lesson in posting style from you.
I see one valid point about Double Battles not being very prominent in Ruby and Sapphire, but the rest is just complaining about the writer presenting fan consensus as if it were an original opinion - that is not real criticism. I don't disagree with you, but you could have made your point in a far less pretentious way.I had problems with specific things said in the article, I quoted it. I merely decided to quote the rest of the article to be thorough and so the author knows I read the whole thing.
Is that supposed to be real rationalization?Everyone and their mother criticizes everyone else regardless of whether they can do it themselves or not. People go around complaining about how all music sucks nowadays without having picked up an instrument. 90% of this forum spout out how uninspired Pokemon is while not having a single original thought in their heads either.