1. Interested in joining the Bulbagarden staff? See details here.
  2. Updated #2: The forums are going to be down Tomorrow (23rd of January) in the morning (JST) for maintenance as we upgrade the software to XenForo 2. Particularly of note is that blogs are going to be removed for the time being, but we are getting a lot of new features with the upgrade.

    For more details, see this thread.

Mafia Philosophy

Discussion in 'The War Room (Mafia Games)' started by Iteru, Jul 28, 2012.

Loading...
  1. Zexy

    Zexy Fire Chicken

    Blog Posts:
    6
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    19,556
    Likes Received:
    6,285
    The point here is that I believe the player should have that information, they need to know what the worst outcome can be if it is game-ending after today.
     
  2. AussieEevee

    AussieEevee Registered User

    Blog Posts:
    4
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2013
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    That's kinda my point. -Lo announcements give players mod-confirmed information. The hosting guides themselves say that mods should avoid giving mod-confirmed information. And I completely agree with it.

    Instead, players should simply be told the game can end soon, and figure the rest out for themselves.
     
  3. Zexy

    Zexy Fire Chicken

    Blog Posts:
    6
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    19,556
    Likes Received:
    6,285
    But it's the kind of information I believe should be given to the town for the sake of fairness. They should have the right to know if they can safely No Lynch at any time just like in those first old simple open setup games, that's how I believe the game is supposed to be played.
     
  4. Lone_Garurumon

    Lone_Garurumon 2/3 Caballeros

    Blog Posts:
    10
    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2015
    Messages:
    7,312
    Likes Received:
    4,349
    So, people intended to mention it here when the game was over, but it looks like no-one has, so it's question time!

    Do you think that vote modifiers (e.g. Hated, Double Voter, etc.) should be shown in the vote tallies or not?

    Personally I can understand the argument from both sides. On one hand, showing those modifiers practically host-confirms a player's role right off the bat, and since vote modifiers are rare for mafia team, you've basically just host-confirmed someone's alignment. On the other hand, by not showing those modifiers, you're effectively lying to your players by telling them game relevant information that you know to be false, very easily getting the game called as bastard for it, and causing the players to make bad outcomes that they would've tried to avoid if they knew.

    Given that I've never actually hosted a game where all rulings were determined by me, I have no idea which way I'd actually go if I included such roles, but I'm interested to see peoples' thoughts on it.
     
  5. Max1996

    Max1996 Blue Bomber of the Net

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2014
    Messages:
    25,447
    Likes Received:
    20,532
    How about stating it's there, but not who has it?
     
  6. CherubCookie

    CherubCookie Cookie Monster

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2017
    Messages:
    368
    Likes Received:
    176
    I don't really like vote modifiers as individual roles, personally. The games I've seen them in have had 1-2x usage and had to be specially activated.

    I'd support the idea of them being counted in the list but not showing which user had the modification.
     
  7. Shion Yorigami

    Shion Yorigami Listless Divine Misfortune

    Blog Posts:
    2
    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2013
    Messages:
    1,472
    Likes Received:
    842
    That doesn't matter.
    Vote counts don't generally show individual voting power regardless, and having an extra vote show up is still pretty revealing. Say 3 players vote for X, and the next count shows 4 votes on them. It's now clearly shown that a vote modifying role is in play, and it's one of those 4 players. There are multiple situations (mafia/masons/paired roles being on the vote and knowing who can't be the cause, one or more of the voters having been rolechecked/otherwise confirmed rolewise, etc) where pretty much outs who/what the source of the extra vote is. Personally, however, I think it's a decent form of balance for the role tbh, as it means they can't just use their extra voting power too freely without likely being outed, but I can understand a host not wanting to influence the game that directly.

    This isn't a bad idea, really. I like it being passively active and full, since it gives the player more pressure to be goddamn careful with their votes, but limits and requiring specific activation also encourages using the ability more carefully.
     
  8. AussieEevee

    AussieEevee Registered User

    Blog Posts:
    4
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2013
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    Depends on the game mode. Bastard games, no. Non-bastard, Yes.

    My definition of a bastard game is when something crucial is hidden from the players. Hiding votes in the vote tally, even if those votes were caused by a double voter or secret voter, is bastard.

    That said, I don't think you need to acknowledge which player caused the additional vote, as that would be giving too much away.

    Kinda like

    Darthwolf 3: AussieEevee, Elieson

    Would be acceptable in my opinion. If players query it, just say that you checked and its correct.
     
  9. Zexy

    Zexy Fire Chicken

    Blog Posts:
    6
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    19,556
    Likes Received:
    6,285
    That's not how I look at it. When I post a vote count as a host, I show the amount of people voting for a player, not the amount of votes put on a player. So it's not a lie and not bastard, it's just that most players assume that each player has one vote because that's how it regularly works. This is how HYPER-MAJORITY would get decided as well, especially in some games with lots of strange voting powers (Baccano! comes to mind first). An interesting case that I had to debate over with ME was when a Voteless Jester could decide HYPER-MAJORITY or not by whether they'd vote or not, even though the vote itself is worth 0.

    Keep in mind the usage of wording like "With X players alive, Y are needed for HYPER-MAJORITY." not "Y votes", just Y players.
     
  10. DarthWolf

    DarthWolf Sith Puppy

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2016
    Messages:
    2,786
    Likes Received:
    1,561
    Why am I being voted?!:eek::p

    I like the way of Zexy, counting players instead of votes.
    If you do go by votes however, the way AE shows it is the best imo. No need to lie and players need to wait for a vote count (often multiple) to check which player has the modifier. It doesn't have to confirm their alignment.
     
  11. Elementar

    Elementar The Paragon of Torna

    Blog Posts:
    13
    Joined:
    May 9, 2015
    Messages:
    5,828
    Likes Received:
    2,960
    I think it's good for a player with an active voting role to try and work around the votals and not get caught. I usually show them.
     
  12. AussieEevee

    AussieEevee Registered User

    Blog Posts:
    4
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2013
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    I dunno :p I just picked two random names out of the hat other than my own.
     
  13. Zexy

    Zexy Fire Chicken

    Blog Posts:
    6
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    19,556
    Likes Received:
    6,285
    But more likely than not, thye don't want to work around the votals. Instead they want to use them to confirm themselves. So such a way to show VC can be very pro-town in some setups.
     
  14. AussieEevee

    AussieEevee Registered User

    Blog Posts:
    4
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2013
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    Agreed. That's why the method I suggested doesn't show which player has the modifier.
     
  15. Zexy

    Zexy Fire Chicken

    Blog Posts:
    6
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    19,556
    Likes Received:
    6,285
    It is still very easy to cheat around that system. If someone claims Voteless, you just have them vote someone alone and see if it will show 0.
    If someone claims Hated, you just have them let be and see if it will show 1.
    and so on...
     
  16. AussieEevee

    AussieEevee Registered User

    Blog Posts:
    4
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2013
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    to be fair though... those are modifiers and can apply to any faction.voteless often goes with jester
     
  17. SoaringDylan

    SoaringDylan The Soaring Dragon

    Blog Posts:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 17, 2015
    Messages:
    4,038
    Likes Received:
    1,802
    In my opinion they should show.

    The argument of double voters most often being town is valid, since town usually has the most players so the most chance of having a double voting role.
    However, that only means it's easier for mafia to fool town once they get the power.
    It's bad to assume alignment with any given role, for example the quadruple voter I had as mafia a while ago or PR giver as tosn in WvM.
     
    AussieEevee likes this.
  18. Zexy

    Zexy Fire Chicken

    Blog Posts:
    6
    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2012
    Messages:
    19,556
    Likes Received:
    6,285
    I don't think that's the real reason Double Voters are most often town. By that argument, Roleblocker should've been most often town too (since it is frequent enough in the town and the argument of town having most players still/always applies), but it's certainly a mafia staple. This is because setups are not made by RNG (with some exceptions like Chaos/Bonanza etc.) It is the host that decides if a role should be town or mafia, and when a regularly town role appears in the mafia there's almost certainly a reason the host put it there, and vice-versa.

    On the topic of Mafia Double Voters in particular, there's another major thing you should not forget; Double Voter is a role that gets stronger the more it survives (since your vote matters more when there aren't too many other voters). For mafia in particular this can be too OP, a +1 vote can turn what would be a LYLO into an automatic mafia win.
    The only time I remember a Mafia Double Voter proves that in what was one of the most hilarious yet outrageous games I've experienced. I'm talking about Gundam SEED Mafia back in June 2014. It had 4 mafia of which 1 was Double Voter and another was 1x Lynchproof. We made it to "MILO" 10p 6-4, but it was actually an auto mafia win (that the host didn't notice so the game went on), I only did in endgame. The actual biggest possibly salvageable (not always, as it leads to LYSLO for the next two days) would be 11p, and that's a lot for a 4-scum game.
    Sorry @FinalArcadia for bringing up that game (it's also the one that had the 1x Fake Copcheck "Santa" I got the idea off for ME VS WE, but it alongside all the other crazy things made it super pro-scum). It might be your "FinalArcadia Can't Balance" Mafia but I had tons of fun in it (even though I was on the chopping block almost every day yet was the only one that got this close to figuring out the team but it was late, I was shouting we should've lynched @HumanDawn and no one listened, THE MEMORIES) and I bet most people at the time did even though the entire town was mad, but it was great to see unfold. So yeah I think hilarious and outrageous fits well that game.
    That's not the way to do setups imo, at any time you're hosting something you look at what is good now, not in future games. When you will end up hosting that future game in which you'll give mafia a double voter, you can consider this argument; but it will be then, and by then you should've made a decision on how to show votes, which is something you need to decide now.
    That was indeed a bad call assumption, but this role is different than Double Voter in three major ways; for one, it was related to a Pretend You're Xyzzy black (mafia) card, which should give people a hint. Two, the entire game had a weird assortment of roles that would make one paranoid anyway. And three, it was designed to actually become weaker as the game goes on exactly so it wouldn't lead to such an -YLO I had other roles that were designed to actually do exactly that lol
     
  19. AussieEevee

    AussieEevee Registered User

    Blog Posts:
    4
    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2013
    Messages:
    6,008
    Likes Received:
    1,793
    I thought that game was called:

     
  20. FinalArcadia

    FinalArcadia ♡ mark vier ♡

    Blog Posts:
    2
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2011
    Messages:
    4,400
    Likes Received:
    729
    @Zexy
    That game is partly why it's taken me so long to try to host again since balancing is the most difficult part for me and that game really exemplified that lol. Doesn't help with balancing that I tend to err on the side of pro-scum. Glad you enjoyed it though! and it was fun to watch over as host, I have to admit
    ---

    Though probably a good time to ask something I've always wanted to: All the hosts in here, what methods do you all have for balancing your games? Do you come up with a rough idea of the roles themselves first and then match them to fitting characters, or do you have the theme/characters and then work off them to create abilities? And after that, how to you determine if it is balanced decently enough?

    I always worked around the characters and then wrote down all the abilities on paper to try to see if everything had a "counter" (like a godfather to counter cop, etc), but I'd definitely like to know some better ways to go about things. so that I can maybe get off my lazy butt and finally host again
     
Loading...
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.