- Joined
- Jun 10, 2018
- Messages
- 213
- Reaction score
- 109
Random First Thought: You need to add HIM to your Index.
I fully level with this viewpoint and I think you did an excellent job expressing it. It is very common place to replace something that you have lost with something new, yet you always have that feeling that it just "isn´t the same" because that is the truth.
I am a little confused as to and there is that word again. What word? Gone. It isn't very clear. Since you repeat it seven times beforehand and a few times after, I assume, but it takes a bit of searching to narrow it down.
I think the use of mother here is well used (is that what 15 year olds call their parents? I am getting too old to remember, but I still use 'mom', not 'mother'), but Fonz seems out of place. It might be easier to describe who Fonz is (cousin, friend, brother, father) instead of using the name. It only appears in the narrative twice and he is surrounded by mystery. I don't think he really needs a name at all. For me, my mind just jumped to the show from the 60s and 70s.
First of all, I love this passage. Second, I don't understand what one refers to in the fourth sentence. One point? Or something else? Or is that the wrong word? I read it several times, but I don't really get it.
Ok, so your first person narration is impressive. I can not write that style to save my life, but it takes a final balance and you did it pretty well. A couple of things from these phrases could be refined though.
--You established in the early dictation that when Red is having active thoughts instead of narration, it would be in italics to avoid confusion. That is good.
-- Later on, when Red is being called, it still seems like he is actively thinking, not narrating, but no italics. It isn't difficult to follow because of the way the narration is spaced, but italicizing it might help the reader a little.
--The final quote has the same problem as the second, in which some of the more active thoughts should be italicized. This portion is actually a little difficult to follow because you have a second speaker, narration, and Red's thoughts, so the italics would be a huge help.
---At the end, when Red thinks So… do I need to speak? makes it extremely obvious that he is actively thinking/partially speaking in his own mind, if that helps portray what I am trying to say.
-There are some other places in the story that might benefit from 'active thought italics' too
-You may also what to differentiate the whispers/sounds that Red is hearing/being called. You already use italics and 'quotes' elsewhere, but it might be interesting if you changed the font style or size (I wouldn't recommend bold). It would be unique and would clarify that it isn't being narrated by Red. Example:
Red.
Yes, that’s my name. Or nickname, but… who called me?
No one said anything. I can’t remember any voice. But I was called.
Red. It happened again. It’s like I reacted to nothing, but clearly it can’t be nothing if I reacted.
OR...
Red.
Yes, that’s my name. Or nickname, but… who called me?
No one said anything. I can’t remember any voice. But I was called.
Red. It happened again. It’s like I reacted to nothing, but clearly it can’t be nothing if I reacted.
I really liked this passage and it does an excellent job of illustrating the complexities of the human mind and thought process. I am writing a story that explores some of the more insane ideas that a mind has, so it really resonated for me.
I had to re-read this several times before understanding what you were saying and it still doesn't make the most sense or really flow at all. I think the major problem is the tense change (seems, speaking, speaks are present/progressive tense and used is past), but I think this could use with a re-wording in general.
All those years, past tense.
"In just a while, you will understand,"
Overall thoughts...
-Again, excellent job on the self-narration, it was pretty easy to follow and, with a few tweeks, it could be easier.
-The beginning was a bit rough. I had to re-read the first dozen or so lines a couple of times each to really get into the flow of the story. Now that I have read the story, the opening makes more sense, but going in blind threw me a little bit.
-I think you portray a very realistic viewpoint of someone who is deeply grieving in the opening stanzas. The emotion is very real and relatable, not the over-the-top drama you see in a lot of characters.
-This isn't a positive or a negative, just something I think is worth mentioning. The opening narration is written almost in the form or style of a poem, which makes for a good read, but then it shifts hardcore when the narration starts to a more standard, self-narrated story. There is a clear break in the story that the shift comes with, so it isn't a problem, just thought it was interesting.
-Most of the fics I have read/the ones I write, capitolize Pokémon names (Ferligatr, Pichu) and item names (Pecha). Obviously, you don't have to and you consistently don't throughout the story, just a point of interest.
-The suicidal options running through Red's head are interesting. They cover the more common ones and give some insight into what someone suicidual might be thinking, which is not something I have ever thought of before. I like stories that make me think or give me interesting insight on subjects that I haven't given much thought, so well done
--This is further supported by Kohath rationalizing a reason NOT to kill himself later in the story.
-Nice explanation of how an aquatic fossil ended up at Mt. Moon. Kind of wish you had thrown in something about Kabuto too
-I have read some mature fics and the topics within were bothersome, but you presented cannabalism/suicide in a fashion that was very palatable.
--The cannabalism was interesting because of the way you rationalized it and it does seem to have some ground in a world where sentient Pokémon are also eaten (I think most people tend to present it as a moral dilemma, but the Pokémon argument calms that argument somewhat)
-Mild curiousity, why Omastar? As a fossil, he fits well into that portion of the story, but it is, for me, an odd choice.
Ok, so the rest of this may be confusing, but I will do my best to explain what I am thinking about without being insanely wordy. Here we go.
-A plot point that I had trouble with was Red very quickly changing his mind about replacing his god. He clearly stated, early on, that Omastar couldn't be replaced (which I agree with), yet was quickly seduced by a new god that wants to do exactly that. Helix outright states that he isn't HIM (which I am confused about, but I will get to that later), but Red seems pretty ready to jump in head first. He is skeptical, and Helix does say he can bring back his old god in a way, but the shift in his thinking is a little abrubt.
-Though the story is clearly about Helix and not the old Omastar (Him? I am a little confused who Him refers to because He was clearly the original Omastar in the early story, but it became blurred later on), I am more interested in the original. Why did Red think he was a god? Why did he worship him? If he is a god, how was he killed by a Feraligatr? (Also curious, since it was mentioned, why Feraligatr didn't kill Red too?) Did he have abilities beyond a normal Omastar? Perhaps that is a completely different story, but the story clearly hints that it was divinity AND a deep affection that tied Red to his original Omastar, but there is no mention of how/why the first Omastar was divine?
-Helix confuses me so much. He in an Omastar, he was Kohath's Omastar, but he wasn't Red's Omastar? Part of him was Red's Omastar? He has the ability to revive Red's Omastar? The story was well told, but I find myself asking more questions than got answered.
--The portion of Helix that confuses me the most is his story. Why would he tell that story to Red? If he is trying to convince Red to release him (which it seems like he needs) than the story seems counterproductive. He is labeled as the God of Chaos and paints himself in a light that screams EVIL GOD. I condone the murder of anyone who gets in my way (even if they slightly deserve it), I turned my most loyal follower into an animal of some kind, I will do whatever it takes to get more followers, and world conquest is (essentially) my ultimate goal. Nothing that Helix said should be convincing to anyone (unless they are evil too, which isn't typically how Red is type-cast) to join his side. I understand that Red is tempted by the resurrection of his old Omastar (kind of reminds me of how Anakin became Darth Vader), but Helix promises that will happen whether he decides to follow him or not.
---All-in-all, I suppose I would expect a character like Helix to be more manipulative/lie to get his way, not paint himself as a villain to someone he wants to follow him
-The fact that Helix is trapped in stone also supports the evil god theory, since that is a commonly used trope for imprisoning powerful creatures that can not be killed.
-Final concern about Helix. If he has the ability to grant people magic, heal them, and foresee the future, how did he die/become trapped in stone? Why does he need boys (Kohath/Red) to lead for him? His story paints a picture of divinity, but his current situation makes it difficult to believe. (Including the fact that he was somehow trapped and needed rescured by Kohath, but that could have been a ploy to gain Kohath's trust. Though, I suppose, the same could be said now for what he is doing to Red).
I know your story was a one-off, but I want to know more (which is really a sign that you are a good story-teller). Too many hanging questions, not enough answers. I understand the purpose of the story (I just wrote a similar character piece for a competition), but I feel like you could do more/expand on this. Good writing though, when I have some time, I may dive into more of your stories.
It’s true that it would probably be very possible to clone another from the fossil. They did it once, can’t be hard to do it again. But it wouldn’t be Him. It wouldn’t remember me. It’d be a spit in the face of His memory. It’d wear His face, have His voice, it could even learn about these things and learn to behave just like Him, but it wouldn’t be Him. Because He is dead. His soul, His consciousness, it’s gone. And there’s that word again.
I fully level with this viewpoint and I think you did an excellent job expressing it. It is very common place to replace something that you have lost with something new, yet you always have that feeling that it just "isn´t the same" because that is the truth.
I am a little confused as to and there is that word again. What word? Gone. It isn't very clear. Since you repeat it seven times beforehand and a few times after, I assume, but it takes a bit of searching to narrow it down.
...No. I think there’s one point left. Fonz knew that was a point, it’s why he said what he said. My mother knows it’s a point, it’s why she isn’t here doing what Fonz asked her to. It annoys me to think that going through with it will likely bring her great satisfaction, but I believe the relief I’ll get will outweigh the disappointment thousandfold.
I think the use of mother here is well used (is that what 15 year olds call their parents? I am getting too old to remember, but I still use 'mom', not 'mother'), but Fonz seems out of place. It might be easier to describe who Fonz is (cousin, friend, brother, father) instead of using the name. It only appears in the narrative twice and he is surrounded by mystery. I don't think he really needs a name at all. For me, my mind just jumped to the show from the 60s and 70s.
Only now, I’m beginning to see the truth. Death will come. There’s no point in avoiding it. But there is one in bringing it in advance. Ending the pain. The pain that I wish I could rise above, but I’m just a human. Maybe if I was a god, I could, but I’m not and never will be.
First of all, I love this passage. Second, I don't understand what one refers to in the fourth sentence. One point? Or something else? Or is that the wrong word? I read it several times, but I don't really get it.
It tries asking those questions I once asked. Why do you care? It’s not you, is it? I wish it had been. I wish I didn’t have to be alive to witness this. I wish the feraligatr had had just a little more bloodlust in him and finished me off as well. ‘Slain’ me too. ‘Slay’. I used to like that word. Now it’s almost as bad as ‘gone’.
Red.
Yes, that’s my name. Or nickname, but… who called me?
No one said anything. I can’t remember any voice. But I was called.
Red. It happened again. It’s like I reacted to nothing, but clearly it can’t be nothing if I reacted.
Am I falling asleep and losing touch with the real world? That’s possible, but something like this has never happened during that trance-like state. Am I… am I going insane? Is this what it feels like to ‘hear things’? Has His death scarred me so badly that my brain has started malfunctioning?
Fossil. I saw the fossil. But it wasn’t in my sight. Only in my mind, without reason. Why would I think of that now? It has nothing to do with what I was thinking about.
Red. Again. Called. It’s called me three times now. Did it also give me that… image of the fossil? Does it want me to get the fossil?
Yes. How do I know that? What convinced me of that? I just know, and I don’t know why I know.
I am your god.”
The statue. The statue spoke. It didn’t move, but I heard a voice. This time there really was a voice.
It was deep. Resounding. Masculine. Yet still gentle somehow.
The question I’m about to ask is stupid, but necessary,
“Is it You, my lord?”
“Yes… and no.”
What does that mean?
“He houses my spirit, but not my soul.”
Did he read my mind? He must have. The non-voice did answer a question before.
“I am a god. Your mind is open to me.”
So… do I need to speak?
“You need not, but I can sense this voiceless way of conversing unsettles you. You shall speak.”
Okay. Alright. I guess that might be easier.
“What did you mean by ‘spirit’?” I ask.
Ok, so your first person narration is impressive. I can not write that style to save my life, but it takes a final balance and you did it pretty well. A couple of things from these phrases could be refined though.
--You established in the early dictation that when Red is having active thoughts instead of narration, it would be in italics to avoid confusion. That is good.
-- Later on, when Red is being called, it still seems like he is actively thinking, not narrating, but no italics. It isn't difficult to follow because of the way the narration is spaced, but italicizing it might help the reader a little.
--The final quote has the same problem as the second, in which some of the more active thoughts should be italicized. This portion is actually a little difficult to follow because you have a second speaker, narration, and Red's thoughts, so the italics would be a huge help.
---At the end, when Red thinks So… do I need to speak? makes it extremely obvious that he is actively thinking/partially speaking in his own mind, if that helps portray what I am trying to say.
-There are some other places in the story that might benefit from 'active thought italics' too
-You may also what to differentiate the whispers/sounds that Red is hearing/being called. You already use italics and 'quotes' elsewhere, but it might be interesting if you changed the font style or size (I wouldn't recommend bold). It would be unique and would clarify that it isn't being narrated by Red. Example:
Red.
Yes, that’s my name. Or nickname, but… who called me?
No one said anything. I can’t remember any voice. But I was called.
Red. It happened again. It’s like I reacted to nothing, but clearly it can’t be nothing if I reacted.
OR...
Red.
Yes, that’s my name. Or nickname, but… who called me?
No one said anything. I can’t remember any voice. But I was called.
Red. It happened again. It’s like I reacted to nothing, but clearly it can’t be nothing if I reacted.
Am I falling asleep and losing touch with the real world? That’s possible, but something like this has never happened during that trance-like state. Am I… am I going insane? Is this what it feels like to ‘hear things’? Has His death scarred me so badly that my brain has started malfunctioning?
I really liked this passage and it does an excellent job of illustrating the complexities of the human mind and thought process. I am writing a story that explores some of the more insane ideas that a mind has, so it really resonated for me.
It seems the voice is speaking through the boy. Took me a bit to get that, as Kohath’s voice is still used. His pitch is about the same as mine and others our age, but he speaks in the same way as the voice before did.
I had to re-read this several times before understanding what you were saying and it still doesn't make the most sense or really flow at all. I think the major problem is the tense change (seems, speaking, speaks are present/progressive tense and used is past), but I think this could use with a re-wording in general.
He reached for the vengeance he’d dreamt of all these years and plucked it like a fresh pecha.
All those years, past tense.
“In just a while, you understand,” he says. “Having sold his masters’ miltank, he left town, carrying along my vessel. I continued to advise and train him as he survived in the wilds by hunting. With my help, he became like one of nature's own, only blessed with superior wit and spells of my creation. Disease avoided him, kept away by my healing touch.”
"In just a while, you will understand,"
Overall thoughts...
-Again, excellent job on the self-narration, it was pretty easy to follow and, with a few tweeks, it could be easier.
-The beginning was a bit rough. I had to re-read the first dozen or so lines a couple of times each to really get into the flow of the story. Now that I have read the story, the opening makes more sense, but going in blind threw me a little bit.
-I think you portray a very realistic viewpoint of someone who is deeply grieving in the opening stanzas. The emotion is very real and relatable, not the over-the-top drama you see in a lot of characters.
-This isn't a positive or a negative, just something I think is worth mentioning. The opening narration is written almost in the form or style of a poem, which makes for a good read, but then it shifts hardcore when the narration starts to a more standard, self-narrated story. There is a clear break in the story that the shift comes with, so it isn't a problem, just thought it was interesting.
-Most of the fics I have read/the ones I write, capitolize Pokémon names (Ferligatr, Pichu) and item names (Pecha). Obviously, you don't have to and you consistently don't throughout the story, just a point of interest.
-The suicidal options running through Red's head are interesting. They cover the more common ones and give some insight into what someone suicidual might be thinking, which is not something I have ever thought of before. I like stories that make me think or give me interesting insight on subjects that I haven't given much thought, so well done
--This is further supported by Kohath rationalizing a reason NOT to kill himself later in the story.
-Nice explanation of how an aquatic fossil ended up at Mt. Moon. Kind of wish you had thrown in something about Kabuto too
-I have read some mature fics and the topics within were bothersome, but you presented cannabalism/suicide in a fashion that was very palatable.
--The cannabalism was interesting because of the way you rationalized it and it does seem to have some ground in a world where sentient Pokémon are also eaten (I think most people tend to present it as a moral dilemma, but the Pokémon argument calms that argument somewhat)
-Mild curiousity, why Omastar? As a fossil, he fits well into that portion of the story, but it is, for me, an odd choice.
Ok, so the rest of this may be confusing, but I will do my best to explain what I am thinking about without being insanely wordy. Here we go.
-A plot point that I had trouble with was Red very quickly changing his mind about replacing his god. He clearly stated, early on, that Omastar couldn't be replaced (which I agree with), yet was quickly seduced by a new god that wants to do exactly that. Helix outright states that he isn't HIM (which I am confused about, but I will get to that later), but Red seems pretty ready to jump in head first. He is skeptical, and Helix does say he can bring back his old god in a way, but the shift in his thinking is a little abrubt.
-Though the story is clearly about Helix and not the old Omastar (Him? I am a little confused who Him refers to because He was clearly the original Omastar in the early story, but it became blurred later on), I am more interested in the original. Why did Red think he was a god? Why did he worship him? If he is a god, how was he killed by a Feraligatr? (Also curious, since it was mentioned, why Feraligatr didn't kill Red too?) Did he have abilities beyond a normal Omastar? Perhaps that is a completely different story, but the story clearly hints that it was divinity AND a deep affection that tied Red to his original Omastar, but there is no mention of how/why the first Omastar was divine?
-Helix confuses me so much. He in an Omastar, he was Kohath's Omastar, but he wasn't Red's Omastar? Part of him was Red's Omastar? He has the ability to revive Red's Omastar? The story was well told, but I find myself asking more questions than got answered.
--The portion of Helix that confuses me the most is his story. Why would he tell that story to Red? If he is trying to convince Red to release him (which it seems like he needs) than the story seems counterproductive. He is labeled as the God of Chaos and paints himself in a light that screams EVIL GOD. I condone the murder of anyone who gets in my way (even if they slightly deserve it), I turned my most loyal follower into an animal of some kind, I will do whatever it takes to get more followers, and world conquest is (essentially) my ultimate goal. Nothing that Helix said should be convincing to anyone (unless they are evil too, which isn't typically how Red is type-cast) to join his side. I understand that Red is tempted by the resurrection of his old Omastar (kind of reminds me of how Anakin became Darth Vader), but Helix promises that will happen whether he decides to follow him or not.
---All-in-all, I suppose I would expect a character like Helix to be more manipulative/lie to get his way, not paint himself as a villain to someone he wants to follow him
-The fact that Helix is trapped in stone also supports the evil god theory, since that is a commonly used trope for imprisoning powerful creatures that can not be killed.
-Final concern about Helix. If he has the ability to grant people magic, heal them, and foresee the future, how did he die/become trapped in stone? Why does he need boys (Kohath/Red) to lead for him? His story paints a picture of divinity, but his current situation makes it difficult to believe. (Including the fact that he was somehow trapped and needed rescured by Kohath, but that could have been a ploy to gain Kohath's trust. Though, I suppose, the same could be said now for what he is doing to Red).
I know your story was a one-off, but I want to know more (which is really a sign that you are a good story-teller). Too many hanging questions, not enough answers. I understand the purpose of the story (I just wrote a similar character piece for a competition), but I feel like you could do more/expand on this. Good writing though, when I have some time, I may dive into more of your stories.