• A new LGBTQ+ forum is now being trialed and there have been changes made to the Support and Advice forum. To read more about these updates, click here.
  • Hey Trainers! Be sure to check out Corsola Beach, our newest section on the forums, in partnership with our friends at Corsola Cove! At the Beach, you can discuss the competitive side of the games, post your favorite Pokemon memes, and connect with other Pokemon creators!
  • Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.

Spoilers New Move Tutors

I want to see Ominous Wind, Air Cutter, Vacuum Wave, Dragon Pulse and Sucker Punch back. Also I can't remember if Icy Wind was in ORAS but it's a rad move.

As for new moves Light of Ruin, Play Rough and Moonblast come to mind since the distribution for Fairy moves is so godawful.
 
I just thought about this last night. I would like Incinerate to be a Move Tutor move. It lost its TM status to Brutal Swing (which sucks unless they increase its BP), so it's viable. But more importantly, it would be great for the very berry-centric metagame that is currently abound in Generation 7. Given that it also hits two Pokemon in doubles, it would greatly help counter berry users (Mago, Iapapa, etc.) while also putting pressure on Pokemon like Kartana, Scizor and Ferrothorn.
 
Magnet Rise- Solgaleo and new poison ub would like it. Every pokemon that floats or can fly through the sky and doesnt have Levitate or flying typing
 
How do you imagine Pokémon like... Beedrill or Venomoth to create a magnetic field? It dosen’t make sense.

not every, but larvesta and Volcarona can, their fire typing is the clue.
Think of it. Naganadel also should be able to taking that "poisons", "acids" also can be used to mantain energy.
"Magnetic amino acids".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please note: The thread is from 6 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom