Peppermint Phoenix
The one once known as Alphaphlare
- Joined
- May 7, 2010
- Messages
- 3,365
- Reaction score
- 862
Re: "Perfect" Kyurem
In this context appearance is important -_-
In this context appearance is important -_-
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In this context appearance is important -_-
In this context appearance is important -_-
In what context?
Based on your logic, Giratina shouldn't be a part of the Creation trio because it has a different body shape, Keldeo shouldn't be considered part of the Musketeer quartet because it's smaller than the others, and none of the Weather trio should even be considered a trio because they're all different colors.
Also, why would they give Kyurem two formes that incorporate Reshiram and Zekrom's design elements if it wasn't a part of the Tao Trio to begin with?
...Shouldn't the mere existence of Reshiram and Zekrom be enough to prove that the twin heroes and original dragon did exist?
...Shouldn't the mere existence of Reshiram and Zekrom be enough to prove that the twin heroes and original dragon did exist?
UUUUUUUUUUUM HELL NO. Just because something exists doesn't mean a supposed origin is true. AT ALL. That is like saying we know god is real because the universe exists. It doesn't compute.
...Shouldn't the mere existence of Reshiram and Zekrom be enough to prove that the twin heroes and original dragon did exist?
UUUUUUUUUUUM HELL NO. Just because something exists doesn't mean a supposed origin is true. AT ALL. That is like saying we know god is real because the universe exists. It doesn't compute.
Uummmmm, sorry but I don't think god plus universe is a good example, considering that we don't know the number one reason why and how the universe was formed.
With Reshiram and Zekrom, we do know how they were formed. By saying that the twins and original dragon didn't exist, then you're also saying that Reshiram and Zekrom also cannot exist, but they do. And I'm most certain that if Game Freak were asked if the legend were canon, they would answer yes. Honestly, I just cannot imagine GF making this whole legend business more complex than it already is. It's pretty obvious that the legend is canon.
Also, please, chill down.
You think we're not making sense? Sorry but I find that uncalled for and a bit rude. I could very well say the same thing to you.
With the two legends, the twin legend is more commonly recited, and is generally accepted by everyone in Unova. I also don't see anyone questioning it, so I don't see where you got that idea from. With Kyurem originating from a meteor, only two people in the entire games mention it. It's not enough to deny the possibility that Kyurem did came from a meteor, but it's certainly still not enough to turn heads. And with Kyurem's new role in BW2, things aren't adding up very well either now. It'd be different if there were more people citing that it came from outer limits of space, but there isn't a lot. If anything, there's more mention of Kyurem being the "monster who kidnaps people during the night to eat them", than mention of the meteor.
Frankly, the only way anything will be answered is when BW2 is released, provided if they do fully explain Kyurem's relation to Zekrom and Reshiram. The only connections that we have thought up are obviously speculation. In short, the only thing we can do, is wait.
The people reciting, I was referring to the NPCs. And I recall the legend being mentioned several times throughout the entire game, and the memory is still fresh in mind considering that I've just played and beaten Black recently. Would you like me to go fetch some quotes? In comparison to the mention of the meteor, which is really only mentioned once, the twin legend is mentioned more frequently and in much greater detail.
Honestly, I find it hard to believe how you're disregarding the twin legend, while regarding the meteor theory highly when only very little of it is mentioned whereas the twin legend more prominent.
Kyurem's role, is for now, speculation. There are many theories of how it could be related to the original dragon, but again, all we can do is wait. If you want to hear my over the top theory, it could be that Kyurem is considered to be such a bad omen that it was deliberately not referenced in the legend out of fear. Or that Kyurem went on its own and gone unnoticed, and perhaps took the form of a meteor then. Either way, we can only wait until GF confirms how it is related to the dragons.
BW2 might not finish the story of the dragons, maybe when the games are released, we learn that there's space for another Kyurem form (the perfect form), and since Ruby and Sapphire remakes are not about to happen, we can still expect Pokemon Grey.
Do you really think they'd bother with a third version now? After these sequels? Gamefreak did say that there wouldn't be a third version for Gen V.
Honestly if you think about it maybe the Orignal Dragon was in the air when it split into the Tao Trio? When Kyurem formed he fell to the earth and created the giant chasm. The locals didn't understand what happened and thought it was a meteor simple the meteor story is just what they thought it was not what actually happened