randomspot555
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2009
- Messages
- 210
- Reaction score
- 0
Oh, you poor thing.
1) I wasn't saying that I was going to pay for it out of any perceived notion of martyrdom. I wasn't making the point like I was heroically offering to pay for the service because... of what exactly I'm not sure what you're getting at. I think the service is worth it, so I'm getting it.
You poor thing. Having to pay]/b] for a service that has ongoing expenses, when the only other option would be to cut off compatibility with prior generations. Geez, what a horrible world we live in.
2) You're right. Transferring to gen 3-5 is not free. It was functionally free to me and a lot of people I know because we have access to multiple DS systems. Pokémon is a game meant to be played with friends, and was done so for a long time with friends you knew in Meatspace. When then Gen IV to Gen V transfer option came around, many people had friends that also had a DS. The interaction probably went a little something like this:
"Hey, can I borrow your DS so I can transfer some pokemon from SoulSilver to Black 2?"
"Sure"
"Cool man"
People have pointed out (frequently) that is not "free", so maybe I'm being selfish when I appreciated a feature that I was able to use without any additional expense to myself. For me it was free. I'm sorry if you felt like you had to buy a sixty dollar dollar used DS to transfer your pokemon. I know that as a bit of a gadget guy, I have three DSs now. I have the original when it came out, a DSiXL several years later because I was travelling a lot and because it was really neat compared to my old scratched up gray brick, and I bought a 3DS because I knew Pokémon was coming out for it. I know for a fact I am not the only person who has done this, which was basically Gamefreaks' thinking when they came up with the feature. You probably know someone who has every generation of DS, just like you have that one friend who has at least one limited edition Xbox 360, despite the fact that his other works fine. You can tally up the damages if you like, but how many of you who used the IV -> V transfer feature were actually out money because you bought an additional DS for it? If this does not apply to you, please picture me like Scrooge McDuck, swimming in my gold coins and used DS's.
The tune to this quote is "me me me me me me". For a lot of people, it wasn't free. For a lot of people, this "free" transferring could pay for Bank for several decades. Even a Game Boy Link cable, approximately $20 at the time of release, could pay for four years of Bank service.
2a) Also, since from my point of view, transfers from gen 3 to 5 were free, or functionally free to people with at least one other person to play with, that is a space of 10-11 years (Sapphire and Ruby released in 2002-2003) to present where the service was inconvenient, but functionally free of charge. So the argument (it's only been in the last couple of gens that you can make transfers at all!) is ridiculous.
I've never claimed that you aren't paying for transfers via Bank. But I have claimed many people have essentially paid for transfers via additional hardware. But you're not just paying for transfers, you're paying for PC box transfers AND storage. And the only other option, despite what the conspiracy theorists say, is no compatibility at all.
3) You're right. You caught me. I didn't read the FAQ. I only read the occasional article about its release and saw the page on Serebii.net about it. Allow me to prostrate myself before the internet forum gods (trolls) for not reading every single bit about it. So yes, you're right, from the looks of it, it does not look like credit card information will need to be placed before using the trial, but saying that I have a "conspiracy theory" over a tactic that is incredibly common in the 21st century is, I'm not sure. Again, I'll quote you and give you the choice between being a liar and ignorant.
You're the one who spouted the conspiracy theory nonsense. Regardless of how "common" it is elsewhere, there was clearly spelled out information that proved otherwise it isn't the case here. So kudos.
4) And yes, I am paying for transferring my pokemon. Part of the service I am paying for is the ability to transfer from older generations up to present. For example, if I want to go through the mind numbing task of importing 1000 pokemon at a time to My Pokémon Ranch to get a Mew egg, and then forward it to my XY account so I can trade it on the PSS for a Wailord, then that is my prerogative. If I want to teach one of my 'mons a whole bunch of tutor moves in three months and then send it forward to my XY, that is my prerogative. I am paying for the service, and that is one of the features of that service. Storage is the key point, but in the FAQ you helpfully pointed out, the transporter and the bank come as a bundled function.
Again, not claiming you aren't paying for transferring. I am claiming that many people have paid for transferring, albeit indirectly, in the past. And the whole point of paying for Transport in this case is because Transport goes to Bank storage. Regardless of if you use the storage for 5 minutes or 5 months, the maintenance for hardware and software is still a cost and still needs to be paid.
5) The software may have been created by a separate subset, but let's not pretend that this is some colossal undertaking. This is no herculean task as far as programming goes. This is not a development team of half a dozen people in a tiny office sweating and wondering whether or not their project is going to make it up off the ground. While I don't really believe that any corporation, especially something like this, is ever moustache twirlingly evil, the thought that "It's a video game company, they produce fun! They would never stoop to less than honest tactics to make a profit" is just as naïve as my point has obviously been perceived as paranoid.
I don't think anyone is claiming it is a herculean task. But it is a separate task outside of the normal development of the game that'll require ongoing support and that costs money. That you don't feel they should be charging money for this service is nice. But since you clearly have been fine with paying $10 for Ranch, this same $10 could buy you two years of Bank service and provides you with 3x the storage of Ranch AND has no limits in regard to save files.
But yeah, obviously this is just a money making scheme and Game Freak is obviously offering a raw deal. Sounds horrible. As I've said, you guys really should just not put up with this horrible treatment from video game companies and protest it by not buying any more Pokemon or Nintendo related merchandise or games.