- Joined
- Dec 14, 2020
- Messages
- 497
- Reaction score
- 522
That's a novelty, removed HMs is QOL.I know, but that doesn’t mean they can’t return for a game.
Walking pokemon were removed for generations but were in gen 7 for one game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's a novelty, removed HMs is QOL.I know, but that doesn’t mean they can’t return for a game.
Walking pokemon were removed for generations but were in gen 7 for one game.
They did. their exact words were "faithful to the originals". I think that makes it pretty clear we'll be using bidoof hm slaves in the remakes
They literally say they’ll be faithful but with modern conveniences. The HM removal has been one of the biggest modern conveniences in Pokémon.With respect, nothing has been said so far to convince me there won’t be HMs. Nothing else makes any sense in my opinion.
Probably because they think that overworld obstacles somehow adds "challenge", which is completely false to me.So... why are people arguing for the inclusion of HMs?
That's a novelty, removed HMs is QOL.
Doesn't change my view though.They literally say they’ll be faithful but with modern conveniences. The HM removal has been one of the biggest modern conveniences in Pokémon.
No one is arguing. It's a difference of opinion.So... why are people arguing for the inclusion of HMs?
Then we'll see who is right and who is wrong.Doesn't change my view though.
They are arguing, they are having a discussion on whether or not TMs will be included or not in a civil manner.No one is arguing. It's a difference of opinion.
I think it's in a similar manner to whether or not regional forms or Dmax will be icluded in the remakes. It''s not because they want it, but because they think that they will be included.So... why are people arguing for the inclusion of HMs?
I never said people were arguing. I said they were arguing for, meaning they're making cases for HMs. Totally different thing.No one is arguing. It's a difference of opinion.
Exactly. Arguments don't always have to be knock down drag out verbal fights.They are arguing, they are having a discussion on whether or not TMs will be included or not in a civil manner.
True. To be fair, we only have one trailer and a press release to go on, so speculation is going to be high.Then we'll see who is right and who is wrong.
Honestly, I see the word arguing as having a more negative connotation. I would classify this as more of a debate.They are arguing, they are having a discussion on whether or not TMs will be included or not in a civil manner.
I would love regional forms...I think it's in a similar manner to whether or not regional forms or Dmax will be icluded in the remakes. It''s not because they want it, but because they think that they will be included.
God, I hope ROM Hacks aren't doing what Essentials games do sometimes where every single HM is an option on the menu. Like, I love the convenience of it, but it'll end up looking like this, and uh....
In other words: what if ORAS Lati@s were every Pokemon.
Bring back soaring!
I think some people are taking "faithful remakes" way too strictly.