- Joined
- Jun 5, 2016
- Messages
- 11,647
- Reaction score
- 26,882
It isn’t, I do agree designs are objective, and I very clearly red that it’s your opinion. I see your opinion is subjective and still be confused on the reasoning to reach said subjective opinions. The hostility is rather unwarranted.Finally, I end up my entire post by saying that the whole concept of "good" designs and "bad" designs is subjective, so I am not saying that not redesigning the characters is an objectively better solution.
My point is, sometimes the conservative approach of not giving characters redesigns can be better.
There’s literally no way of deducing that till we've seen the redesigns. I'm not sure I’m which situation exactly would the conversation approach be better, because like I said, there’s a statistically higher probability of people liking at least one design if there are two designs instead of one, and your entire reasoning to reach your opinion (ORAS designs being "bad") to extrapolate this to BDSP is kind of flimsy seeing that it’s entirely possible (and more likely) that the hypothetical BDSP designs won’t been be done by the ORAS people.
I know you posted your opinion, I'm just confused at your thought process. No need to accuse people of not reading your posts.