Dude, be lucky that they are giving them any sendoff at all. Will it satisfy everyone? No. But I think that is better than nothing.They discarded 25 year old characters like they were nothing, without as much as say why they did it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dude, be lucky that they are giving them any sendoff at all. Will it satisfy everyone? No. But I think that is better than nothing.They discarded 25 year old characters like they were nothing, without as much as say why they did it.
If the series was cancelled, I would be happy that they gave us an additional 11 episodes. That is obviously not the case. The series will continue, they will just retire Ash in an artificial way. That is one of the main problems to me: how artificial Ash´s departure feels. It looks like it was a last minute decision (it definitely was).Dude, be lucky that they are giving them any sendoff at all. Will it satisfy everyone? No. But I think that is better than nothing.
It still kind of makes the statement from TV Tokyo come off a bit misleading though. I can't really blame them for not announcing the changes right then and to be fair, they didn't confirm a new series with Ash as the protagonist when they made that statement. But at the same time, saying that Ash's adventures would continue did give the impression that he wouldn't be replaced. Getting the announcement of the new series just a couple of weeks later really made it even more surprising in a way. If they just meant that Ash's adventures would continue for this mini-series before being replaced, then that just makes their original statement a bit too misleading for me.To be fair, Ash's journey will continue, we just won't follow that journey anymore. Not to mention that we still have the 11 episodes epilogue when they said that.
I'm not sure if Journeys was that unpopular in Japan and I'm still not sure about the higher ups would really care that much about ratings when the anime is a marketing tool for the games more so than anything else. Besides that, I think that there would be other reasons why the series had low ratings, such as changing timeslots, that wouldn't really change with new leads.I really doubt they expect to reenact the phenomenom that this franchise was 25 years ago. It's just that the Pokemon anime's popularity has been on the decline for a while now, so they're trying to use new leads to try to attract new fans.
I mean, people on this forum have said that Journeys was unpopular in Japan and mentioned low ratings to prove it. It seems that they were right, then it is not so weird that they try something different with new protagonists.
This is borderline false advertising. They already knew Ash would leave so they should have had the decency to stay quiet. Add the Team Rocket Paldean segments and fans had every reason to believe Ash´s journey would continue.It still kind of makes the statement from TV Tokyo come off a bit misleading though. I can't really blame them for not announcing the changes right then and to be fair, they didn't confirm a new series with Ash as the protagonist when they made that statement. But at the same time, saying that Ash's adventures would continue did give the impression that he wouldn't be replaced. Getting the announcement of the new series just a couple of weeks later really made it even more surprising in a way. If they just meant that Ash's adventures would continue for this mini-series before being replaced, then that just makes their original statement a bit too misleading for me.
From what I could gather by searching japanese boards, the main complain was how they shafted Ash in favour of a new character and the episodic structure, which makes their decision to subtitute Ash for a new character even more nonsensical. Also, you are absolutely right about the change in timeslot.I'm not sure if Journeys was that unpopular in Japan and I'm still not sure about the higher ups would really care that much about ratings when the anime is a marketing tool for the games more so than anything else. Besides that, I think that there would be other reasons why the series had low ratings, such as changing timeslots, that wouldn't really change with new leads.
Totally agree. I think the higher ups/whoever calls the shots is overonfident. I also agree that some fans are too otimistic about the new series. Who´s to say we will even have gym battles? It´s pretty obvious from recent years that they want a more episodic show. Also, giving their track record with female characters in the last series, I have no hope for Riko.If they are trying to use new leads to attract new fans, I'm not sure why they would feel like that's necessary to do now after twenty five years. Having the same lead never really prevented new kids from checking out the anime. Each series is pretty self-contained where you don't need to watch hundreds of episodes in order to follow along with the current series and the writers seemed to know that they get a new audience every few years anyway. Having new leads certainly is going to give the new series more attention and potentially attract more people, but I'm not sure about it leading to a huge increase in ratings or more new fans to the anime than usual. It will take awhile to see how the new leads and series are received in Japan, as well as in other countries when the dub eventually airs, but I still think that replacing your iconic protagonist after twenty five years is a pretty huge risk, something that I think a lot of fans are underselling, and I'm not sure how much payoff they'll get with this change. Granted, while I do want to give the new series a chance, I also don't have the biggest confidence that this will lead to significantly better writing for the anime either.
From what I could gather by searching japanese boards, the main complain was how they shafted Ash in favour of a new character and the episodic structure, which makes their decision to subtitute Ash for a new character even more nonsensical. Also, you are absolutely right about the change in timeslot.
I don't think I'd go as far as calling it borderline false advertising. They didn't say anything about a new series with Ash as the main lead when they made that comment. That being said, it still gave fans a false sense of security. I instantly thought that it did confirm that Ash wasn't going anywhere, which did provide some relief from the endless "Is Ash going to be replaced/retired?" debate after his battle with Leon. Plus, with the Team Rocket segments, it made me think that Ash would end up in Paldea too. He technically still can even without being the main lead, but it still gave off a misleading impression.This is borderline false advertising. They already knew Ash would leave so they should have had the decency to stay quiet. Add the Team Rocket Paldean segments and fans had every reason to believe Ash´s journey would continue.
I just wished someone would come forward and give us the true reason for this change. But knowing who we are dealing with, I know that won´t happen.
I honestly always felt like the screentime issue between Ash and Goh was exaggerated. Maybe it helps that I watch the dub on Netflix, so it's easier for me to binge watch new episodes as opposed to waiting a week for each episode, but it never felt like Ash was shafted in favor of Goh, even during the first year of the series. I can understand the complaints on the episodic structure when I think that does tie in to some of the issues I've had with Journeys.From what I could gather by searching japanese boards, the main complain was how they shafted Ash in favour of a new character and the episodic structure, which makes their decision to subtitute Ash for a new character even more nonsensical. Also, you are absolutely right about the change in timeslot.
I can't blame fans for being optimistic since I do still want to enjoy the anime and ideally the new leads will be likable. I just think this change came twenty years too late to work for me. While I wouldn't be surprised if they do skip over Gyms again, I'd still be pretty annoyed. I like the Paldea Gym Leaders and they shouldn't be given the same treatment that the Galar Gym Leaders had. The anime has had good writing for female leads in the past and despite how she was treated, I liked Chloe a lot. She had some good moments and still felt like a highlight of Journeys in spite of also being one its problems at the same time. That being said, coming right after Journeys, a series where the boys got to go on cool adventures with their Pokemon while the token girl stayed at home with her Eevee most of the time, I don't have a lot of hope for Riko's writing at the moment either.Totally agree. I think the higher ups/whoever calls the shots is overonfident. I also agree that some fans are too otimistic about the new series. Who´s to say we will even have gym battles? It´s pretty obvious from recent years that they want a more episodic show. Also, giving their track record with female characters in the last series, I have no hope for Riko.
About changing your protagonist after 25 years, I still can´t find a single franchise that did it and succeeded. Some people in another tread talked about Marvel, which is nonsensical, since those comics don´t even have a fraction of the popularity they once had, proving my point.
It would be weird if their takeaway from that complaint was that Ash was an obstacle. Plenty of other characters in other series could get the spotlight without making claims that they shafted Ash's screentime, so I don't see why it would be suddenly a problem here to the point where they thought that they needed to replace him. DP in particular did a terrific job balancing out the focus on Ash and Dawn, so it isn't impossible that they could have just done something like that instead.I mean, I wouldn't be surprised that criticism makes them feel Ash was an obstacle. Other character couldn't take the spotlight without accusations that they shafted Ash.
Now, Ash isn't the protagonist anymore. There will definitely be comparisons with the new protagonists, but it will be weird to complaint that the protagonists have the spotlight.
If the series was cancelled, I would be happy that they gave us an additional 11 episodes. That is obviously not the case. The series will continue, they will just retire Ash in an artificial way. That is one of the main problems to me: how artificial Ash´s departure feels. It looks like it was a last minute decision (it definitely was).
It still doesn´t make sense. You have a series with 2 main characters. One is in the show for 25 years and a great deal of people still liked his storyline. The other was a new addition and was not well received. How can your take away be to take out both of them when the old character was basically the reason you still had a steady viewership? I can´t understand.I mean, I wouldn't be surprised that criticism makes them feel Ash was an obstacle. Other character couldn't take the spotlight without accusations that they shafted Ash.
Now, Ash isn't the protagonist anymore. There will definitely be comparisons with the new protagonists, but it will be weird to complaint that the protagonists have the spotlight.
They discarded 25 year old characters like they were nothing, without as much as say why they did it. They even had the audacity of assuring people that Ash winning agains Leon (a terrible battle in my opinion, since Ash would be washed if he followed the rules of only one gimmick, proving that he still as a long way to go) was not the end of his journey, when, by the time they gave that interview, they wre already aware of his retirement.
Respect for the fans who have followed the series for 25 long years isn´t part of the current writers/producers vocabulary. We old fans are not needed anymore. We are just a burden. They deluded themselves into thinking they can grab enought new viewers to reenact the phenomenom that this franchise was 25 years ago. They are wrong. I´m all for trying new things to grab new viewers, but you should always respect the fans that were with you from the begining. Currently, in different forms of media, there is this view that innovation is the way to go and that, for some reason, it can´t coexist with tradition. I thought Pokemon was different. I was obviously proven wrong.
I appolagize for sounding so petty, but I can´t really explain how important this series is to me. I am not joking or dramatizing when I say that, during a very dark period of my life, an episode of this anime singlehandedly saved my life. It´s thanks to this series that I´m still here today. Seeing it all end, without a valid reason other than innovation, is just to much.
Yeah, I don’t think they’d want to make a clean break either. If they did, there wouldn’t be anything to fall back on. Speaking of continuity in relation to what PM (23) could be like, I think I finally found out a plausible theme/format that would fit another world tour without just being Journeys 2.0 and screwing over Paldea:I'd rather wait and see than assume that. I highly doubt the writing staff wants to throw out everything related to Ash's saga, so if it does come to that I'll assume it's marketing being tyrannical and stupid - but even just from a marketing perspective, having Ash and Pikachu show up once in a while is something they could use to build hype. I see no advantage whatsoever to making a clean break.
It's a bit of an odd statement for me since we got so many female a battlers in JN.Also, giving their track record with female characters in the last series, I have no hope for Riko.
We also didn't have a proper female lead in Journeys though. It was easily one of the biggest problems I had with the series right off the bat and the decision still seems so baffling to me, especially when most female leads tend to be pretty popular. I don't think that Chloe was necessarily badly written, but keeping her as a minor character who would get screentime every now and then to showcase the next Eevee evolution instead of a main character after she became a trainer at least was such a terrible decision. Dawn being so stagnant in spite of her multiple appearances in Journeys also really rubs me the wrong way. Much like Chloe, I don't think that Dawn is necessarily written terribly in her appearances. She feels a lot more in-character than she did in BW, but not doing anything with Dawn to show how she had progressed in her off-screen adventures is really jarring when they seemingly did that with every other returning character in the series. They could have done the bare minimum by giving her a Typhlosion and they still couldn't be bothered to do that.It's a bit of an odd statement for me since we got so many female a battlers in JN.
It's hard to say for sure when we don't know what Riko's goal is. While she wouldn't be exactly in the same position as the female companions, the fact that they haven't had any battle active female characters in the main cast for a long time still makes me question if they'll suddenly make the new female lead into a battler. It isn't like Ash's role as the main lead prevented them from doing more with female characters either. Dawn and to a lesser degree May had plenty of battles during their respective series. They weren't the primary battler, but they still had battle active goals and were given pretty consistent focus for their battles. Dawn was basically a co-protagonist alongside with Ash and her Contests were just as important as Ash's Gym battles.If Riko is the lead, I don't think she can be compared to any old companion. She will likely be the primary battler and the one who's goal involves having the most fights. That's something we haven't seen in the anime because Ash was always the MC and had that role. If she takes the player character role in the new series, that automatically sets her apart from the other female companions.
It's possible but the Pokemon franchise itself has had female battlers front in center for a long time now in the games (since Gen 2) and side content like Masters and the web animations like Pokemon Evolutions. It wouldn't surprise me if they're finally gonna refresh anipoke itself to match up with the rest of the franchise in that regardIt's hard to say for sure when we don't know what Riko's goal is. While she wouldn't be exactly in the same position as the female companions, the fact that they haven't had any battle active female characters in the main cast for a long time still makes me question if they'll suddenly make the new female lead into a battler. It isn't like Ash's role as the main lead prevented them from doing more with female characters either. Dawn and to a lesser degree May had plenty of battles during their respective series. They weren't the primary battler, but they still had battle active goals and were given pretty consistent focus for their battles. Dawn was basically a co-protagonist alongside with Ash and her Contests were just as important as Ash's Gym battles.
The problem is that they have been less interested in giving the female characters battle active goals since XY. Arguably, I'd say that this started in BW since despite Iris's goal, she really didn't battle or train her Pokemon that much. It was a noticeable downgrade from Dawn in that department. If Riko is going to take the player character role, that would make her different from the female companions, but I just have a hard time seeing them doing that when we haven't had battle active female characters in the main cast for well over a decade at this point. If they aren't interested in making female companions battlers, I don't know if they'd be willing to do that with a new female lead.
I'm less confident about that coming right after Journeys. I'd be happy if they would give the female leads battle active goals again, but at this point, I'll believe it when I see it.It's possible but the Pokemon franchise itself has had female battlers front in center for a long time now in the games (since Gen 2) and side content like Masters and the web animations like Pokemon Evolutions. It wouldn't surprise me if they're finally gonna refresh anipoke itself to match up with the rest of the franchise in that regard