• Hey Trainers! Be sure to check out Corsola Beach, our newest section on the forums, in partnership with our friends at Corsola Cove! At the Beach, you can discuss the competitive side of the games, post your favorite Pokemon memes, and connect with other Pokemon creators!
  • Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.

Pokemon you think should not have been created

Jynx and only jynx

I'm still not sure as to why Jynx was even created. It is literally a humanoid Pokémon... but it doesn't even feel like a Pokémon like ???

Well, for me it's eevee, everyone goes nutty over it and turns it into something not so fabulous anymore.

I will admit Eevee is overhyped but I thought the whole "evolve into many different things" is appreciated
 
I don't like Snorlax. But I suppose it's the roadblock Pokemon we had to have. So for one that should never have been created, I'd say... Lickilicky.
 
I never really understood the point of Game Freak creating Stantler. It seems that they created a deer (or a moose) Pokemon and pretty much forgot its existence for several generations to this day, not even bothering to give it an evolution or anything. I suppose I'd understand the point of it more if it was an early route Normal-type, but Sentret and Ferret already have that spot taken. Not to mention that Miltank is found not much farther and it outclasses Stantler in every way (speaking purely in Gen 2 here and not HGSS)

Also, if you're patient enough, you could wait for a Teddiursa for an Ursaring.

So Stantler will unfortunately be in that awkward spot where it doesn't.... fulfill any sort of purpose, it seems. If Game Freak Zen-Oh'd (points if you get that reference) Stantler out of existence tomorrow, I doubt anyone would notice.
 
Please note: The thread is from 5 years ago.
Please take the age of this thread into consideration in writing your reply. Depending on what exactly you wanted to say, you may want to consider if it would be better to post a new thread instead.
Back
Top Bottom