Falconwing
The Greatest Pokémon Ranger
- Joined
- May 12, 2009
- Messages
- 37,255
- Reaction score
- 2,471
Okay, seriously, let's try to keep this civil.
Well, the "ugly" Pokemon was a centipede, so I think it works in that case. I don't like to think that ugly = bad design, especially when it's in the benefit of the Pokemon's characteristic or basis. A cute centipede isn't something I want, really.
Okay I'm going to say this matter-of-factly and once and for all (since I don't feel like arguing any more, since people don't seem to understand me).
I am not doubting at all the the final evolution of Mijumaru can hold sword helmet with it's fore/front legs at all.
That is not the point of my argument at all.
What is the point of my argument, is that I cannot see Mijumaru's final evolution using sword helmet any sort of feasible battling style that would be superior with Mijumaru and it's direct evolution or even a bipedal Pokemon.
Maybe that's why I'm so adamantly confused. Maybe Mijumaru's final evolution's shell blade does work on a different battling style than Mijumaru and its direct evolution. Fine I'll accept that, but it seems like a waste of a possibly decent final idea to me of using shell blade in the maximum potential. Mijumaru and Mijumaru's direct evolution can in fact bring shell blade out to it's maximum potential. Mijumaru's final evolution is pretty much a step backwards and a step sideways.
Im really interested in Gears evos. Do we have any other info than whats already been said? I know it's a 3'er, and the 3rd one is a subtle change from the 2nd
550: Basurao. Two Formes. One is green with red stripe and eyes, other with blue stripe and eyes. Second seems more aggresive. Water Type
I can understand a 2nd stage, but a 3rd? That's pushing it to me. I mean, it's a gear.
Im only repeating what I've heard. Plus, it's a gear, you can make a lot of things with gears, like a coo-coo clock or a chronometer
But a COOL bad ass centipede wouldn't hurt. Though I have to admit, I still want to see the ugly cocoon. The fact that the cocoon is the final stage intrigues me
Im only repeating what I've heard. Plus, it's a gear, you can make a lot of things with gears, like a coo-coo clock or a chronometer
I don't get why Basurao has the color alteration...hmm...come to think of it, did any demo shots show both colors? Anyway, I was thinking of making Basurao my Water-dude, but I dunno if he doesn't evolve.
I've only see the red one like in this shot.
But why would they do "a subtle change" between the 2nd and 3rd stages of and evolution? I mean, look at what you guys have been arguing about. It doesn't make much sense. I wouldn't want a pokemon that doesn't do anything but get stronger and not change appearance much, that's just boring.
Well that's a good point, but look at... like almost all 3 member evolutionary lines... like the Ralts family. From Kirlia to Gardevoir or Gallade is a pretty big jump, but she didn't grow 14 arms, get 10 feet tall and lose a leg. There's a subtle line between growth like Luxio to Luxray and just being lazy.Well, if all of a sudden it sprouted wings, changed colors and lost all it's appendages it wouldn't make much sense now would it? There's a fine line between too much evolving and not enough.
here guys, someone made it cool
![]()
But why would they do "a subtle change" between the 2nd and 3rd stages of and evolution? I mean, look at what you guys have been arguing about. It doesn't make much sense. I wouldn't want a pokemon that doesn't do anything but get stronger and not change appearance much, that's just boring.
Also, apparently Shikijika has an evolved form and, like people expected, it seems to change...I think it's just one evolution...which is kind of good, since 4 spots wasted on it wouldn't be a good thing imo.
Except in my head I can think of many things that makes the appearance drastically different but still keep it bipedal (likewise with the other Pokemon).
I mean if I can think of something and Ken Sugimori had trouble then maybe Ken Sugimori is only a good artist but not necessarily creative.