Only part of it (and its very obscured).Is there any picture of the Shikijika evo?
No, I mean, they claim there's a pure-Flying Legendary.A type combination we've always wanted? Fire/Water? Psychic/Dark? Dragon/Ice (Most Likely)? Dragon/Dragon?
Only part of it (and its very obscured).
http://bmgf.bulbagarden.net/showpost.php?p=2167000&postcount=54
Pure....Flying?No, I mean, they claim there's a pure-Flying Legendary.
But there is a Dragon/Ice according to them, and Kibago and its ilk are said to be pure Dragon, ending with Ononokusu.
Well, you can make a lot out of that ;O
Joe also said in a chat that we would all love #649, not only what its design looks like, but what its based off of.You asked me to tell you things. Well I have been given the authorisation to post these;
# There are 156 new Pokémon within this generation; 153 within normal gameplay and further 3 event Pokémon (#647, #648 & #649) that will be distributed in a manner similar to Darkrai, Shaymin & Arceus in the previous generation
# In regards to a few numbers and details;
* #633 through #635 are a Dark/Dragon-type evolution chain
* #638 is a Steel/Fighting-type Legendary
* #639 is a Rock/Fighting-type Legendary
* #640 is a Grass/Fighting-type Legendary
* #641 is a Pure Flying-type Legendary
* #642 is an Electric/Flying-type Legendary
* Reshiram is to be #643
* Zekrom is to be #644
* #645 is a Ground/Flying-type Legendary
* #646 is a Dragon/Ice-type Legendary
* #647 is a Water/Fighting-type Event Legendary
* #648 is a Normal/Psychic-type Event Legendary
* #649 is a Bug/Steel-type Event Legendary
I have more, such as descriptions of several of these but sorry, I can't post them yet
Oh yes, because one of the biggest Pokemon Webmasters is going to make up fake Pokemon just for the lulz. I take this as fact. This pretty much confirms what Melkor said anyway, so I'll be staying away from his site so I won't be spoiled.Melkor posted on his blog that FIVE of the pokemon are event-only, so either one of these could be inaccurate.
Well, we "got" our Dragon/Dark pseudo-legendary line and a Dragon/Ice legendary that may end up as the third mascot.
Sure a lot of Fighting-type legendaries (the first three are probably our trio).
Pure-Flying legendary? Really?
Again, take everything Serebii Joe posted as a grain of salt.
"Tsutaaja was aristocratic….for example like “The Rose of Versailles”."
Wasn't the Smugleaf in the B&W preview female?
Yes!
>_>
I have a one (very major) issue with that list from Serebii. We know V is a fire/psy event legend, yet it says there are 3 event legends, none with that type combo.
O snap.Serebii from SPP: Victini is #494 and I technically class it as ingame
Oh yes, because one of the biggest Pokemon Webmasters is going to make up fake Pokemon just for the lulz. I take this as fact.
"Tsutaaja was aristocratic….for example like “The Rose of Versailles”."
Wasn't the Smugleaf in the B&W preview female?
Yes!
>_>
I have a one (very major) issue with that list from Serebii. We know V is a fire/psy event legend, yet it says there are 3 event legends, none with that type combo.