Articwolf10
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2010
- Messages
- 2,223
- Reaction score
- 44
Re: Starters final forms?
Am I the only one who thinks the Chespin evo's arr badass?
Am I the only one who thinks the Chespin evo's arr badass?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree. What about this one? I personally loved it.
Froakie's aren't that bad, but I still prefer the other I previously posted.
Chespin's are as terrible as the previous one.
Definitely do not like Froakie's at all. Doesn't even look like Froakie or a Pokemon at all.Anyways, I found some fake evolutions on tumblr and I loved Froakie's.
It is not exactly what I had on my mind, but it is better than another Poliwrath/Seismitoad:
Chespin's fake evos look awful. xD
That's the best Froakie evo I've seen so far. Fennekin's could be (much) better. Chespin's...just no.
Doesn't even look like Froakie
or a Pokemon at all.
Doesn't even look like Froakie
True, exactly like Empoleon doesn't look like Piplup, Blaziken doesn't look like Torchic, Torterra doesn't look like Turtwig and Samurott doesn't look like Oshawott.
or a Pokemon at all.
Yes, it does look like a Pokémon, even more than some legit ones. lol
I unfortunately have a feeling one of them will get the short end of the stick and acquire one of these ugly green colors that they seem to love to give to Pokemon so often.
I have nothing against green, but man, there are so many shiny Pokemon out there who look seasick or get a very unnatural bright green color and I just feel so sorry for them..
You didn't offend at all. My point was that some starters don't look like their basic forms when they are fully evolved.I personally see Froakie to evolve into something more like Infernape. I don't mean to offend in way if I did.
Chespin already looks awful.I don't see how Venusaur's design is simple either. The only Kanto starter with a somewhat simple design is Blastoise. Also, it is hard to get the point when you use Infernape as an example of a "complicated" design, because it is not. Emboar would have been a better example (and yet, its design isn't bad per se). But yeah, I get it.
I think it's those golden plates that make Infernape somewhat complicated, but you're right, Emboar is even more complicated. Venusaur is a bigger Bulbasaur with a flower on its back, it seems pretty simple to me. Would Meganium make a better example maybe?
But those plates ties well with what Infernape was based on. I think its design would look weird without them. Venusaur... well, it is a giant frog-like dinosaur with a big tree and leaves on its back and with some weird thing popping out of its skin. The design isn't bad, but isn't simple either. And sure, Meganium is a perfect example, as were Typhlosion.
Anyways, I found some fake evolutions on tumblr and I loved Froakie's.
It is not exactly what I had on my mind, but it is better than another Poliwrath/Seismitoad:
Chespin's fake evos look awful. xD
I'm actually kinda baffled, these starters didn't get nearly as much hate as Unova starters initially did.
I dunno, is my memory failing me? Or am I right?
[Anyone have a clue if this is from Nintendo Direct?
"Bubbly blue frog with melee skills."
"Firefox with latent Psychic powers."
"Chespin, he'll be able to learn Pin Missile attack."