- Joined
- Jun 19, 2020
- Messages
- 2,431
- Reaction score
- 5,403
Anyone else dislike how, Game Freak has forced the concept that One of the Three Starters in every generation is the "Best" one that deserves the most attention?
Obviously there's always been some sort of favoritism in the franchise (Hi Charizard ), but ever since X and Y it feels more a lot more in-your-face? Especially with things like Ash-Greninja or Charizard having 2 Mega Evos.
I have No hate towards Pokémon like Greninja and Charizard but a lot of their pushing feels really.... Unbalanced (?) for a lack of a better term?
It makes one Question "Well what's even the point of having 3 Starters to choose from if they're going to put care into only ONE?"
Not to mention there's also always gonna be the underlying paranoia that the Starter you liked may end being the one who gets shafted/screwed over HARD (Like Poor Chespin...)
Perhaps maybe it's just me, but what do you guys think?
Do you think all 3 Starters Should be treated more equally?
Or are you fine with the way things are?
Obviously there's always been some sort of favoritism in the franchise (Hi Charizard ), but ever since X and Y it feels more a lot more in-your-face? Especially with things like Ash-Greninja or Charizard having 2 Mega Evos.
I have No hate towards Pokémon like Greninja and Charizard but a lot of their pushing feels really.... Unbalanced (?) for a lack of a better term?
It makes one Question "Well what's even the point of having 3 Starters to choose from if they're going to put care into only ONE?"
Not to mention there's also always gonna be the underlying paranoia that the Starter you liked may end being the one who gets shafted/screwed over HARD (Like Poor Chespin...)
Perhaps maybe it's just me, but what do you guys think?
Do you think all 3 Starters Should be treated more equally?
Or are you fine with the way things are?