• Hey Trainers! Be sure to check out Corsola Beach, our newest section on the forums, in partnership with our friends at Corsola Cove! At the Beach, you can discuss the competitive side of the games, post your favorite Pokemon memes, and connect with other Pokemon creators!
  • Due to the recent changes with Twitter's API, it is no longer possible for Bulbagarden forum users to login via their Twitter account. If you signed up to Bulbagarden via Twitter and do not have another way to login, please contact us here with your Twitter username so that we can get you sorted.

Teacher indicted for popup ads

Status
Not open for further replies.

Transfinite

追放されたバカ
Joined
Jan 5, 2003
Messages
2,227
Reaction score
6
This is ridiculous. Source!

Amero is the 40-year-old Connecticut substitute teacher convicted in January 2007 of four felony "corrupting a minor" charges when the computer she was using in front of her middle school class began opening a loop of pornographic pop-up windows. She faced a possible 40-year sentence. I wrote a short piece about her in our May 2007 issue:

As she tried to close the ads, the loops only intensified. She says some sort of adware or malicious software on her computer caused the pop-up ads to appear; such infections were indeed found on the computer later, including the Web address of a seemingly innocuous hairdressing site that spun off the loop of porn ads that Amero described in her defense. The school had filtering software on all of its computers but had let the software licenses expire, rendering the filters useless. The prosecution later conceded that Amero’s computer was never even tested for malware.

The state’s expert witness, a computer crimes investigator with the Norwich Police Department, testified that because the URLs for the offending sites were “highlighted,” Amero must have deliberately clicked on them. Yet none of the major Web browsers requires a mouse click to highlight a link; any address that has been loaded by the browser, which happens whenever a pop-up window opens, will show up as “visited.”

When Amero's case hit the Internet early last year, tech experts across the country quickly recognized what had happened, and dozens volunteered to aid in her defense. A state judge granted her a new trial in June of last year after he was presented with evidence from actual experts (as opposed to the Norwich Police Department's badly misinformed computer crimes investigator) that the computer had been infected. Yet the state's prosecutors stuck to their guns.

Finally last week, the state of Connecticut dropped the four felony counts against Amero. But her vindication isn't quite complete. As part of the plea, Amero still had to plead guilty to a misdemeanor, pay a $100 fine, and will have to forgo her teaching license in Connecticut. She has also been hospitalized from stress and a heart condition brought on by the whole ordeal. Incredibly, some public officials in Connecticut still insist she's guilty of knowingly corrupting minors with porn. Here's Hartford Courant columnist Rick Green:

New London County State's Attorney Michael Regan told me late Friday the state remained convinced Amero was guilty and was prepared to again go to trial.

"I have no regrets. Things took a course that was unplanned. Unfortunately the computer wasn't examined properly by the Norwich police," Regan said.

"For some reason this case caught the media's attention,'' Regan said.

Another state's prosecutor, David Smith, apparently also said at the hearing that, "the State felt that they had enough of a case, but that due to Julie’s declining health, that he and William Dow had agreed to a lesser charge." How generous of them.

Oh, and the attorney's email address is [email protected]

Let me post that one more time for all the spambots that are without a doubt trolling this board and harvesting email addresses: [email protected]
 
Maybe the spambots can send some porn to that address... show that guy how the internet really works. I am sure that many of us have seen pornographic images on the internet without even looking for them and/or even wanting to see them, and that's without even having a malware infection. It's pretty bad that a school allows licenses to expire on software that is supposed to help prevent things like this from happening, and then shifting the blame...
 
The American justice system never ceases to amuse me. Why are they letting these idiots into the bar?

Wow, that's terrible. I can't believe they actually believe she's guilty. They must know better and just don't want to take the blame for letting the licenses expire.

Could have figured out a better way of covering that up (like not suing the teacher and renewing the licenses in quiet).
 
Could have figured out a better way of covering that up (like not suing the teacher and renewing the licenses in quiet).

Because I'm sure this was brought about by a kid telling their parents who then complained.
 
I laughed at this... Not at how the teacher was treated, but how they just Blamed her like that. I mean, this is why teachers can't use the internet here for classes anymore, I mean, come on. It's not like it's her fault.

Stupid America.
 
That's awful! Poor woman. She's a victim of an accident beyond her control and utter idiots. :/
 
Aww....

That poor teacher! I really feel sorry for her! =(

And that was so wrong of them to treat her like that. Making her look guilty for this, when it was really just an accident. Pop-up adds just happened to come up on her computer, because it didn't have the protection it should've had, and so there was nothing the teacher could've done to prevent this.
 
well i would say it is the wondeful american legal susyem but thet british one isnt a lot better these days
 
Wow. This is just terrible. How odd, hospitalized for stress and a heart condition. She should sue them right back for damages.

As for the kid telling their parents, I think that that is ridiculous. The parents should know that the teacher didn't intend to show the ads to everyone.

This is the kind of thing that makes me sick. Bleh.
 
Doubtless at least one minor would have enjoyed the show.
 
Wow. This is just terrible. How odd, hospitalized for stress and a heart condition. She should sue them right back for damages.

She probably should sue them. And charge the expert witnesses that said she clicked the links with perjury charges. That should do it.

This just isn't right.


If anyone's a hacker, try this: http://www.reason.com/blog/show/130227.html#1148977. They've got about the right idea of poetic justice.
 
LOL! That's hilarious! Wow, it's like a sub is standing in front of a bunch of 6th graders giving them a PowerPoint presentation and then all this porn pops up! I can just imagine all the kids asking "what's that thing?" and "is that really what mommy looks like with her clothes off?" And then the guy gets indicted on felony charges, for showing porn to little kids!
 
You know, my history teacher once mixed up the tapes we were supposed to watch in class and showed us one of her "tapes". She realized it just as it "Started"
She quietly left the school, but to this day shes the laughing stock of all the teachers there
 
DCM, we all know that you're just being your <s>crazy</s> eccentric self. Sorry for saying that, now I'm going to get a freakin' inraction for that too from evkl.
 
Last edited:
Wow, that was appropriate. I should go tell evkl on you. But I won't.
 
I hate this!! That is not spam! You might as well say everything is spam if that's spam! Why doesn't DCM get any warnings? Everyone likes to pick on me. I can see why I got the first two warnings today. BUT NOW I HAVE FOUR! You could have just given me one but YOU HAD TO GIVE ME TWO! AAAARRRGHHHHH!!!
 
Back on topic, please. To clarify, warnings don't give points, infractions do, but warnings are there to help you straighten out. If you have questions, PM me.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom