• Another scrumptious episode of Bulbacast has been uploaded to YouTube. Watch it here. I hope you don't feel desserted after watching this one.
  • 4chan is an 18+ website, and as such we do not want to expose our underage users to that site.

    You may post screen shots and text from 4chan, but direct linking to the site, or it's archival sites is not allowed.

    Thanks.

  • Hello all! The forum staff have introduced a new rule set. We've reduced the number of rules, made trick language easier to understand, and have hopefully simplified the rules to make understanding them easier. Please have a read over the new forum rules here.
  • Fun & Games is searching for new mods! Did I catch your attention? Head on over here!

There are petitions about Gamefreak fixing the 'Galar Pokedex' thing

PkmnTrainerV

Flame Trainer
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
7,946
Reaction score
15,582
new pokemon are a lot to animate.
That shouldn’t be a reason to remove older Pokemon, though. Most of the work on them is already done. And I’m pretty sure the amount of new Pokemon is going to be on par with, if not less than Gen 6 and 7.

What about moves? objects? cities? small details?
Again, that shouldn’t be a reason to remove older Pokemon.
Its funny that you speak about the small details since you’ll find people pointing out details and things wrong in the game, even though I’m not sure if I support the extreme nitpicking.
 

Matleo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
3,589
Reaction score
566
That shouldn’t be a reason to remove older Pokemon, though. Most of the work on them is already done. And I’m pretty sure the amount of new Pokemon is going to be on par with, if not less than Gen 6 and 7.


Again, that shouldn’t be a reason to remove older Pokemon.
Its funny that you speak about the small details since you’ll find people pointing out details and things wrong in the game, even though I’m not sure if I support the extreme nitpicking.
some probably that mega evolve others maybe because they would be too similar or overshadow the new pokemon for new generation players that will start their journey with pokemon?
 

PkmnTrainerV

Flame Trainer
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
7,946
Reaction score
15,582
some probably that mega evolve others maybe because they would be too similar or overshadow the new pokemon for new generation players that will start their journey with pokemon?
People who’re starting their journey with Pokemon will have no Pokemon to transfer and will not see newer Pokemon getting overshadowed.The game as some old Pokemon so that argument falls apart.

And Pokemon that can Mega evolve are in the game, but cannot Mega Evolve because Mega evolution literally doesn’t exist- like Tyranitar and Lucario.
 

Matleo

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 26, 2015
Messages
3,589
Reaction score
566
People who’re starting their journey with Pokemon will have no Pokemon to transfer and will not see newer Pokemon getting overshadowed.The game as some old Pokemon so that argument falls apart.

And Pokemon that can Mega evolve are in the game, but cannot Mega Evolve because Mega evolution literally doesn’t exist- like Tyranitar and Lucario.
maybe it's the time in games when mega stones weren't discovered yet? in the anime they will probably be there and in the next games too probably.

The gen 3 remakes had new megas even if in that region we had them not previously but you know how it worked and works?

Interesting what time frame we visit Galar? But looks like when we entered Kalos at the same time? Maybe ancient artifacts mega stones and
y-rings where discovered or rather how to use them again like ancient pokemon trainers did? Mega Ryquaza.

Probably Ash in anime will represent this games and the second comming with megas and z-moves.

Maybe they plan to use all in one but need to think how to animate it to make it look good?
 
Last edited:

Kyriaki

Lovely
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
13,963
Reaction score
3,295
The people who work on the overworld are not those working on the Pokemon models and animations. One doesn't have to do with the other.
Is there a site where they list who works on what?
 

Kyriaki

Lovely
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
13,963
Reaction score
3,295
Shouldn't that be on the credits?
They do list all the names but most of them don't have their names hyperlinked to where they work for, so unless there's a full list of who worked on what in the games and where they work for, it would be difficult to know how development/design teams work within Game Freak or who works with Game Freak for the games.
 

Joker901

Well-Known Member
Joined
Feb 13, 2018
Messages
2,438
Reaction score
5,821
Don't forget that if (for example) they used the same exact models and animations from x/y in sun and moon, the people who created the models and the animations will be credited too even if they didn't work on them again in s/m. So we don't know if all the people credited actually worked on the new pokemon models/animations (which are not that many) or if among them there are people who just worked on the old models/animations previously.
 

Silktree

Madame's Butler
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
17,800
Reaction score
11,077
But the XY list for Pokemon models and motion is a lot longer, so yes, it would seem that the SM list is just for the additions. That's odd given the number of modelers, but the number of animators is reasonable considering the following animations.
 
Last edited:

KrspaceT

Active Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2014
Messages
954
Reaction score
861
A Twitter user named Glaber plopped this down is a bit of a visual representation of what we know, assume we know, or don't know is in the games.

 

Knightwolf09

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2016
Messages
3,444
Reaction score
5,993
Dunno why there's an assumed confirmed list. I doubt if any evolved or pre evolved forms are in their evolutions would be cut.
 

TechSkylander1518

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
2,876
Reaction score
8,013
Dunno why there's an assumed confirmed list. I doubt if any evolved or pre evolved forms are in their evolutions would be cut.
They could always remove a Lax Incense to keep Snorlax in, but not Munchlax, or keep out Moss Rocks and Icy Rocks to keep in Eevee, but not Glaceon or Leafeon. We did have a similar situation in LGPE.
 

AngryBinacle

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 10, 2016
Messages
713
Reaction score
1,376
They could always remove a Lax Incense to keep Snorlax in, but not Munchlax, or keep out Moss Rocks and Icy Rocks to keep in Eevee, but not Glaceon or Leafeon. We did have a similar situation in LGPE.
Hardly comparable, LGPE are only about the original 151+Meltan/Melmetal; also, Munchlax was shown to be inside a home.
 
Top