Joker901
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2018
- Messages
- 3,743
- Reaction score
- 8,237
Except they have bilions of dollars and they could have easly managed all the problems if they wanted to. They just didn't want to. Let's be honest, they don't care about you as much as you care about them.No, feel free to complain, but don't throw around these garbage phrases of them being "incompetent" and "lazy." I don't see you importing models over to a new system, so maybe don't go there? You can't see the workload of having to fix all the shit that didn't make it over due to program issues that are totally unrelated to anyone's competence, and we have seen some new and updated animations amidst all of the work they apparently have to fix.
I fully support criticizing the fact that they opted to cut pokemon instead of extending their release schedule- assuming that decision was made early on, which I imagine it had to have been. I don't think that was a good call on their part- it was one that surely made sense to them because they figured that we wouldn't want to wait, but we would rather wait. But you can criticize without using banal insults that really do not apply to the situation.
You've called them lazy and incompetent, how is that not being insulting?
In my previous post I analyzed the interview with tons of IF. Considering we don't know what they said, I would find lazy recreating the all models without improving them (do we know IF they really did It? No). I would find incompetent IF they really tried to import the models and they failed to do It (do we know IF this really happened? No). My post was obviously suggesting that IF they said those things (and I seriously doubt about it) things wouldn't have changed. The models are most likely the same, so either they lied or they just admitted they had problems and they want us to pay for them.