• Another scrumptious episode of Bulbacast has been uploaded to YouTube. Watch it here. I hope you don't feel desserted after watching this one.
  • Hello all! The forum staff have introduced a new rule set. We've reduced the number of rules, made trick language easier to understand, and have hopefully simplified the rules to make understanding them easier. Please have a read over the new forum rules here.
  • Fun & Games is searching for new mods! Did I catch your attention? Head on over here!

Was the transition from 2D to 3D inevitable?

ItalianBaptist

Informed Casual
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
175
Reaction score
224
This actually came into my head while watching The Geek Critique’s video on Sonic 06. In it he said some of the questionable character designs had to do with the push in the field towards “realistic graphics” but that now the industry is sort of pushing back. He uses Cuphead as an example of a game that is 2D and unrealistic but highly stylized, and still taking advantage of the next gen systems’ extra power. With all the Sword and Shield drama I can’t help but wonder if the Pokémon franchise should have taken a similar track with the main series games.

We all know about the jump from sprites to models with the 3DS, and at the time it was a pretty big deal. But in hindsight I have to wonder if it was in fact a good thing or even necessary to begin with. I’ve seen multiple posts all saying that the models seem pretty lifeless compared to the old sprites or even the older Stadium models. I’m not sure it’s as pronounced of a difference for me but I at least get where they’re coming from. And then things got even more complicated with the issues surrounding Sword and Shield and particularly Game Freak’s explanation for not including all the Pokemon.

It really makes me question whether they could have done something 2D or sprite based as a “stylistic choice” and then we wouldn’t have some of the headaches we do now. Of course, there would be other headaches to replace the current ones but still :p
 

Aulos

Praise Euterpe
Joined
Sep 23, 2013
Messages
1,322
Reaction score
1,110
I don't know. I'd been waiting for a mainline 3D Pokemon game since Gen I. I remember picturing it in my mind, even back in the N64 days.

Personally, I'm not big on sprites. I feel like they were just a product of the technology at the time, and when I see them in modern games I don't get it. I'm not saying that everything translates perfectly into 3D (anime cel-shaded style has never worked for me in 3D, aside from maybe Dragon Ball FighterZ), but on the other hand nothing really works for me with pixelated sprites.

I find it weird to compare Cuphead to sprite-based games. Cuphead, while looking back to older styles of animation, utilizes the technology given and beautifully looks like what the style/era of animation it is conveying. I don't find games looking back at the 2D sprite-based eras to be quite as amusing because games were already there, and in fact, have never left there, since there are plenty of sprite-based games coming out every year. And as I said, IMO, it's just not that appealing. I'm a fan of a lot of antiquated, obsolete things myself such as music, musical instruments, architectural styles, etc. So I do get how people can enjoy it, I just don't.

Anyway, yeah, opinions. Enough of that, I think that Pokemon had to move on. Pokemon remaining a sprite-based 2D game would look pretty awkward up against the rest of Nintendo's line-up, and just wouldn't feel like proper $60 games (which the current Pokemon games already struggle heavily with). GameFreak had already started experimenting with a little 3D since Gen IV. And I, for one, actually really think that they did a fantastic job with the 3D Pokemon models. So much so it actually exceeded my expectations.

One last thing: Even when games try to "stylize" pixelated art to an HD style you get stuff like Octopath Traveler. I'm not saying it is a bad game, but any time I've tried to play that game it hurts my eyes. It just didn't work. I would have rather they just made a 3D game. I know a lot of people like the style, but in my eyes, it's just proof that sprite are an antiquated style, and trying to mesh them with modern effects just doesn't work.
 

TechSkylander1518

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
2,908
Reaction score
8,139
People might consider the models lifeless, but that's probably easier to solve on a model than it is a sprite. You can add new animations to a model, but to make a sprite look different, you'd have to start redrawing every frame with the new detail. It's also been way easier to update graphics-instead of redrawing every Pokemon in a new style, it's just a matter of making the new ones match.
 

Silktree

Madame's Butler
Joined
Mar 14, 2005
Messages
17,812
Reaction score
11,089
I will probably always consider GBC graphics and music to be my favorite, but such a huge series can't stay back in the 90s or even the 2000s.

It's also been way easier to update graphics-instead of redrawing every Pokemon in a new style, it's just a matter of making the new ones match.
Tell that to Game Freak.
 

Bolt the Cat

Bringing the Thunder
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
4,929
Reaction score
2,854
Thing is, 2D sprites are generally only accepted in lower budget entries where the developers don't have the time and/or money to do full 3D. Cuphead is a $20 indie game, it's reasonable not to expect complex, realistic graphics from that sort of experience. Full scale retail releases? Not so much. Generally if you're selling a game for a full $60 nowadays, it's expected to be a AAA game with high end graphics and gameplay. So since Pokemon trends more towards the full scale retail side of the market, and now it's even being sold as a full $60 console game, adapting to 3D graphics was expected. The only thing they could've done to get away with not going 3D would be to sell the games as a budget digital title, then it wouldn't carry the expectations of being a AAA game and there'd be no need to push the graphics. Ultimately, 3D graphics aren't the root cause of Sword and Shield's drama, it's the $60 price tag. There'd be less of a stink over things like Dexit and the graphics if this were a $20-$30 eShop game instead of a $60 retail game.
 

Azu

New Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2010
Messages
5
Reaction score
4
I've thought about this for quite a while now. I sort of just wish Pokemon would go back to sprites. Instead it's like they're sort of trying to be modern with 3D models, and yet they don't seem capable of going all the way with it. I feel like they should either stick with what they're proven to be the best at (simple graphics, solid mechanics and gameplay) or go all out and actually be "Next Generation".

But this is just a personal preference.
 

lapisora

... Humans, you say?
Joined
Mar 28, 2019
Messages
347
Reaction score
373
IMO the biggest issue the 3DS games and SwSh have is that they have lacklustre animations. Give the NPCs convincing idle animations, make battles look like they did in Battle Revolution, improve the use of the camera, and we wouldn't have this uproar over graphics like we do today. Right now, it feels like the series has awkwardly grafted 3D graphics onto a 2D game.

I love sprites, and personally would be fine with Pokemon regressing if it meant Game Freak could spend the extra time creating a game which feels naturally made for 3D. That is very unlikely to happen, however, and like Bolt the Cat said, only indie games use sprites these days.
 

Poke Dragon

The boundary between opposites.
Joined
Apr 30, 2018
Messages
1,797
Reaction score
3,560
It was inevitable that Pokemon would enter the 3D era, all other main Nintendo series which are longrunning changed to 3D, Pokemon was obviously going to change to 3D once the 3DS was on the market, and now they can only go forward from here due to many reasons.

My only gripe with the 3D stuff is the fact that many cries weren't updated properly and the fact that for the time being, not much effort is put into having a content filled post-game.
 

Everclear

New Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2019
Messages
23
Reaction score
57
I preferred the 2D style because it seemed cuter and ever since the games switched to complete 3D, I haven't liked them as much. The 2D style just works so much better for this particular franchise because the graphics were never the main selling point of the games in the first place.
 

EliteLinnie

New Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2019
Messages
1
Reaction score
2
I loved 2D, and I love 3D as well. However I miss the little changes each game would bring us with new sprites.
The poses, the colours and the attitude of every single pokemon had slight changes that made rediscovering all of them so much fun! I miss that.
 

Yami-no-Game

Member
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
91
Reaction score
221
It was always on the horizon I suppose, but I'm not happy about it because the franchise didn't need better graphics, just a better storyline with a good post game in each installment.
 

Kyriaki

Lovely
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
13,977
Reaction score
3,314
With everything else moving to 3D, it was inevitable that Pokemon would also move to 3D. But even though I appreciate the more realistic approach they took since Gen7, I didn't mind the chibi-style in Gen 6.
 

colours

ᴄʟᴏᴄᴋ ᴛɪᴍᴇ ᴅᴏᴡɴ ᴛʜɪs ᴇᴍᴘᴛʏ sᴛʀᴇᴇᴛ
Joined
Oct 9, 2011
Messages
1,746
Reaction score
985
perhaps I'm in the minority, but I honestly feel that even if Game Freak stuck to sprites, there would've been at some point (perhaps around Gen 6) where people would've started perhaps getting tired of them. Gen 5 didn't exactly do the sprites justice because of the weird animations, so I'm unsure what direction Gen 6 would've taken it. so really, it would've been inevitable at some point or another.
 
Top