- Joined
- Oct 12, 2014
- Messages
- 5,533
- Reaction score
- 6,755
tbh, does it even matter, its the same evolutionary line.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So is that how people get their hands on Pokemon with hacked in moves?There's a market for fake TMs (i.e. CD-RWs that're sold as "TMs" but can be blanked by their users to have them teach moves that legitimate TMs - the TMs you see in the console games that, as my headcanon above infers, are manufactured as CD-ROMs - wouldn't teach to a Pokemon) that're sold by the Pokemon world's villainous teams.
I've got two headcanons regarding TMs:
- The TMs in the console games are manufactured in the CD-ROM format to follow standards that were created with the intent of preventing Trainers from hacking signature moves such as Pika Papow, Dragon Ascent, and Spacial Rend into the TMs.
- There's a market for fake TMs (i.e. CD-RWs that're sold as "TMs" but can be blanked by their users to have them teach moves that legitimate TMs - the TMs you see in the console games that, as my headcanon above infers, are manufactured as CD-ROMs - wouldn't teach to a Pokemon) that're sold by the Pokemon world's villainous teams.
The Pokemon Center themes and Poke Mart themes are actually being played through speakers, like music in a grocery store. Sometimes they do double duty as elevator music (the Pokemon Center theme more than the Poke Mart theme as it's more soothing).
What if TRs are just old TMs before they were reusable that have been given a different name for distinguishment (yes, I know that's not a word, sue me).Anyway, extending out of your idea, perhaps you could even say that the advent of reusable TMs in Gen 5 represents an advancement in the technology - before then, TM production companies had difficulty in making the discs long-lasting. (And we can handwave ORAS away here by pointing toward the technological improvements that already exist in that universe compared to the original RSE.)
The reason why you can't register Pokémon you see in battle facilities in your Pokédex is because you're forced to close your Pokédex while inside them, perhaps to not interfere with the facility's sensitive equipment.
Speaking of TRs, I've got a headcanon about them: that they're manufactured as CD-RWs (meaning they're rewritable), and due to the fact that they're single-use items, the user manuals that come with TRs state that they must be fully blanked by their users after using them once and then sent back to their manufacturers to be rewritten.Though now that would lead me to wonder about TRs...
I'd say yes in the case of Lance and his Dragonite...So is that how people get their hands on Pokemon with hacked in moves?
She could also be Canadian.A popular theory claims that Fantina is from Kalos since she speaks French in the English games. However, she speaks English in all the other games and is found in neither Kalos nor Galar. My headcanon is that she's actually from the Pokemon world's equivalent to the Caribbean, probably Martinique and that she is Creole, speaking a mix of both English and French.
White people can be foreign, though. Foreign just means they’re from a different country than the one they reside.If she's Quebecian I don't see why they would need to play up her foreignness when she would be just white. As far as I'm aware, Quebec French is just a variation of French and it is not intrinsically mixed with English the same way the creole languages are.
I volunteer for allowing you to review my headcanons.On an unrelated note, I have been considering making a video series where I look at the headcanons in this thread and give my opinions on them but I didn't want to do it without checking in to see who would and would not be okay with that. It won't be anything overly in depth or critical like "headcanon doesn't work because of complex technical junk" cause I don't understand any of that stuff more of a "I like this headcanon because of X" or "I don't like this headcanon because of Y but I can see why somebody would think it." I figure I'd probably do a page or two per-episode.
Meant to reply to this earlier, but better late than never. I'd happily volunteer.On an unrelated note, I have been considering making a video series where I look at the headcanons in this thread and give my opinions on them but I didn't want to do it without checking in to see who would and would not be okay with that. It won't be anything overly in depth or critical like "headcanon doesn't work because of complex technical junk" cause I don't understand any of that stuff more of a "I like this headcanon because of X" or "I don't like this headcanon because of Y but I can see why somebody would think it." I figure I'd probably do a page or two per-episode.