- Joined
- Aug 30, 2021
- Messages
- 6,109
- Reaction score
- 5,473
- Pronouns
- He/Him
Ehhhh......he's a step in the right direction, but more like Silver or Blue. May/Brendan and Barry, not mention Bianca and Cheren, weren't bad either.like Bede?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ehhhh......he's a step in the right direction, but more like Silver or Blue. May/Brendan and Barry, not mention Bianca and Cheren, weren't bad either.like Bede?
like Bede?
I think Hugh is a pretty good model for rivals to emulate, yeah. I think he took the best parts of Barry, while the other friendly rivals have mostly taken the worst parts. Cheren and Bianca are fine though.I think I like Hugh the best out of all the Rivals. He was friendly to you, but also super confident in himself with goals other than just trying to out do you.
Was that not Blue's personality in the Gen 1 games and remakes?A character like Melli from Pokemon Legends Arceus is kinda what we need in a rival. Melli was outright antagonistic and did everything he could to halt your progress, while acting completely full of himself and looking down on you.
So we need an obnoxiously flat and shallow character with no depth beyond pure antagonism toward the player? No thank you.A character like Melli from Pokemon Legends Arceus is kinda what we need in a rival. Melli was outright antagonistic and did everything he could to halt your progress, while acting completely full of himself and looking down on you.
i think this is a weird take when rather than arceus you would have a whole core game to develop that personality and give it depthSo we need an obnoxiously flat and shallow character with no depth beyond pure antagonism toward the player? No thank you.
The only issue is that they've never actually been able to do that with an antagonistic rival. Even Silver's character writing kind of sucks.i think this is a weird take when rather than arceus you would have a whole core game to develop that personality and give it depth
i feel like it could have been better but it’s not, like, atrociousThe only issue is that they've never actually been able to do that with an antagonistic rival. Even Silver's character writing kind of sucks.
Honestly it feels like the fandom lionizes jerk characters; I saw people hyping up Melli and then when I met him in-game he turned out to be an antagonistic speedbump with zero interesting traits; too cartoonish and inept to take seriously, but not funny enough to be charming or amusing.So we need an obnoxiously flat and shallow character with no depth beyond pure antagonism toward the player? No thank you.
Keeping in mind I never played gen 5 so maybe it's different there...The only issue is that they've never actually been able to do that with an antagonistic rival. Even Silver's character writing kind of sucks.
The styles were extremely half-baked and they should get rid of them. All they ultimately accomplished was to make Speed the best stat.I've seen some people on youtube say they want this so I figured I would come by to say the opposite
I don't want Agile and Strong style returning for this game, it was great for a side series but not every single game.
It was fun and all but, at least from my experience, agile style rarely actually gave me an extra turn, the feature combined with the inability to switch mons when an opponent sends out something new means that there were alot of situations where they sent out a Pokémon and double attack ko'd my Pokémon that was already out which got annoying. Similarly my Pokémon just felt a lot weaker because 90% of the time after they KO'd a single Pokémon they would get destroyed by whoever was sent out next thanks to the sytles, which sure might be more balanced but made my Pokémon feel like they couldn't take down more than one Pokémon ever.
Was that not Blue's personality in the Gen 1 games and remakes?