Life
oh my
- Joined
- Apr 5, 2013
- Messages
- 2,726
- Reaction score
- 898
It is more about stories not being judged on the same content over and over again. If someone just posts one very short chapter, there is nothing really new, comparatively, to judge. If someone posts 15/20k words and they are still of a high quality, I am more than happy to give them an award again, but it seems silly to give them an award if they only updated the story, like people said, a day or two before the awards began. You'd have to think about Best Story: does something deserve to win the top award two seasons in a row if they only posted one new chapter that didn't really move the plot along?
I admittedly am torn with answering here, because while on one side I agree that a story shouldn't win with only one new chapter, I also don't think it should matter in the big scheme of things, as like I said above I feel the award should go to the story that best deserves it, whether the author's dedication to publishing new content is factored in or not.
Points don't really mean as much as they used to anymore, they are more there as guidelines, so losing points won't actually change anything. I am weary of adding more categories, just as I don't want to dilute things and I think having 'best new story' would open the door to 'why don't we best long running story', 'why don't we split the categories up by length', etc, and I am not rebooting the awards. We do have a Best Newcomer award to recognise new authors
Ah, alright. I wasn't sure how much points still effected things but from what I remember it used to be a considerable factor for most categories. I also understand your concern with others wanting new categories, though I would argue there is some merit in a Best New Story category, though I figure I'm the only one who does. ^^
Either way, I'm not against the new editions, and I think the awards will be interesting with them implemented next season.