Search results for query: *

Oh, okay. I was bringing up Pokemon and One-Piece as a comparison because despite having different source materials, they are anime broadcasted on television (or other media) which can reach out to a large group of audiences. You mention that both are targeting kids as the main audience, but...

You're making me confused. Are you implying that the target audience who watch Pokemon would be the same age as the target audience for One-Piece? I don't know what doesn't make sense.

I believe anime like One-Piece airs on a Sunday morning, like 9am or 9:30am or something. The time slot is perfect for "Sunday Morning Cartoons" for children but when you compare it to a show like Pokemon, there's a lot of blood and violence. So, assuming that 13+ would watch One-Piece...

I'm genuinely curious why there's so much controversy surrounding a mom's pokemon or a family pokemon going along with the son. It's not like Mimey is property that Delia had to put Mimey in her will for Ash to inherit.

There's no doubt they are focusing to appeal to preschoolers. Yet they can't get rid of Ash because he's too iconic. That's kinda the central problem to most of the controversies of the anime.

Preschoolers (the target audience) haven't been around for twenty years so they probably won't consider it confusing.

I don't see it as weird. Mimey stayed with Delia. It was technically a family pokemon. The family pokemon becomes part of the son's team. A backstory or basis for that would be cool, but even if they don't introduce a reason I think people can just roll with it. Is it really necessary to show...